Forensic Science International: Genetics
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 3-12 , March 2007

DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): Recommendations regarding the role of forensic genetics for disaster victim identification (DVI)

  • M. Prinz

      Affiliations

    • Office of Chief Medical Examiner, Department of Forensic Biology, 520 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 212 447 2618; fax: +1 212 447 2630.
    • ,
  • A. Carracedo

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
    • ,
  • W.R. Mayr

      Affiliations

    • Division of Blood Group Serology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
    • ,
  • N. Morling

      Affiliations

    • Department of Forensic Genetics, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
    • ,
  • T.J. Parsons

      Affiliations

    • International Commission on Missing Persons, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    • ,
  • A. Sajantila

      Affiliations

    • Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland
    • ,
  • R. Scheithauer

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Legal Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria
    • ,
  • H. Schmitter

      Affiliations

    • Federal Criminal Police Office, Wiesbaden, Germany
    • ,
  • P.M. Schneider

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Cologne, Germany

Received 25 September 2006 ,Accepted 10 October 2006.

References 

  1. Wright RJ, Peters CD, Flannery RB. Victim identification and family support in mass casualties: the Massachusetts model. Int. J. Emerg. Ment. Health. 1999;1:237–242
  2. International Criminal Police Organization, Interpol Disaster Victim Identification Guide, 2002–2005. http://www.interpol.int//Public/DisasterVictim/default.asp.
  3. Pan American Health Organization, Management of dead bodies in disaster situations, Disaster Manuals and Guidelines Series no.5, Washington, 2004.
  4. National Institute of Justice, Mass fatality incidents: a guide for human forensic identification, 2005. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/199758.htm.
  5. In:  Morgan O,  Tidball-Binz M,  Van Alphen D editor. Management of Dead Bodies after Disasters: A Field Manual for First Responders. Washington: Pan American Health Organization; 2006;
  6. National Institute of Justice, Lessons learned from 9/11: DNA identification in mass fatality incidents, 2006. http://www.massfatality.dna.gov.
  7. Fregeau CJ, Vanstone H, Borys S, McLean D, Maroun JA, Birnboim C, et al. AmpFlSTR Profiler Plus and AmpFlSTR Cofiler analysis of tissues stored in Genofix, a new tissue preservative solution for mass disaster DNA identification. J. Forensic Sci. 2001;46:1180–1190
  8. Jensen RA. Mass Fatality and Casualty Incidents. A Field Guide. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2000;
  9. C.H. Brenner, Reuniting El Salvador families. http://dna-view.com/ProBusqueda.htm (accessed September 20, 2006).
  10. Pollner F. Forensics meets medical genetics in mass fatality victim identification. NIH Catalyst. 2006;14:1–8
  11. Budowle B, Bieber FR, Eisenberg AJ. Forensic aspects of mass disasters: strategic considerations for DNA based human identification. Legal Med. 2005;7:230–243
  12. Budimlija ZM, Prinz M, Zelson-Mundorff A, Wiersema J, Bartelink E, MacKinnon G, et al. World Trade Center human identification project: experiences with individual body identification cases. Croat. Med. J. 2003;44:259–263
  13. Holland MM, Cave CA, Holland CA, Bille TW. Development of a quality, high throughput DNA analysis procedure for skeletal samples to assist with the identification of victims from the World Trade Center attacks. Croat. Med. J. 2003;44:264–272
  14. Alonso A, Andelinovic S, Martin P, Sutlovic D, Erceg I, Huffine E, et al. DNA typing from skeletal remains: evaluation of multiplex and megaplex STR systems on DNA isolated from bone and tooth samples. Croat. Med. J. 2001;43:260–266
  15. Prinz M, Caragine T, Kamnik C, Cheswick D, Shaler R. Challenges posed when processing compromised samples. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Human Identification. Phoenix, AZ. 2002;http://www.promega.com/geneticidproc/ussymp13proc/contents/prinz.pdf
  16. Guimaraes MA. The challenge of identifying deceased individuals in Brazil: from dictatorship to DNA analysis. Sci. Justice. 2003;43:215–217
  17. A. Piccinini, F. Betti, M. Capra, C. Cattaneo, The identification of the victims of the Linate air crash by DNA analysis, Progr. Forensic Genet. 10, International Congress Series 1261, Elsevier, 2004, pp. 39–41.
  18. Hellmann A, Rohleder U, Schmitter H, Wittig M. STR typing of human telogen hairs—a new approach. Int. J. Legal Med. 2000;114:173–269
  19. Wiegand P, Kleiber M. Less is more—length reduction of STR amplicons using redesigned primers. Int. J. Legal Med. 2001;114:285–287
  20. Tsukada K, Takayanagi K, Asamura H, Ota M, Fukushima H. Multiplex short tandem repeat typing in degraded samples using newly designed primers for the TH01, TPOX, CSF1PO, and vWA loci. Legal Med. 2002;4:239–245
  21. Ohtaki H, Yamamoto T, Yoshimoto T, Uchihi R, Ooshima C, Katsumata Y, et al. A powerful, novel, multiplex typing system for six short tandem repeat loci and the allele frequency distributions in two Japanese regional populations. Electrophoresis. 2002;23:3332–3340
  22. Butler JM, Shen Y, McCord BR. The development of reduced size STR amplicons as tools for analysis of degraded DNA. J. Forensic Sci. 2003;48:1–11
  23. Grubwieser P, Mühmann R, Parson W. New sensitive amplification primers for the STR locus D2S1338 for degraded casework DNA. Int. J. Legal Med. 2003;117:185–188
  24. Chung DT, Drabek J, Opel KL, Butler JM, McCord BR. A study on the effects of degradation and template concentration on the amplification efficiency of the STR miniplex primer sets. J. Forensic Sci. 2004;49:733–740
  25. Schneider PM, Bender K, Mayr W, Parson W, Hoste B, et al. STR analysis of artificially degraded DNA—results of a collaborative European exercise. Forensic Sci. Int. 2004;139:123–134
  26. Dixon LA, Dobbins AE, Pulker HK, Butler JM, Vallone PM, et al. Analysis of artificially degraded DNA using STRs and SNPs—results of a collaborative European (EDNAP) exercise. Forensic Sci. Int. 2006;164:33–44
  27. Holland MM, Fisher DL, Mitchell LG, Rodriguez WC, Canik JJ, Merril CR, et al. Mitochondrial DNA sequence analysis of human skeletal remains: identification of remains from the Vietnam war. J. Forensic Sci. 1993;38:542–553
  28. Gabriel MN, Huffine EF, Ryan JH, Holland MM, Parsons TJ. Improved mtDNA sequence analysis of forensic remains using a “mini-primer set” amplification strategy. J. Forensic Sci. 2001;46:247–253
  29. Edson RM, Ross JP, Coble MD, Parsons TJ, Barritt SM. Naming the dead—confronting the realities of rapid identification of degraded skeletal remains. Forensic Sci. Rev. 2004;16:63–90
  30. Gill P, Brenner C, Brinkmann B, Budowle B, Carracedo A, Jobling MA, et al. DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendations on forensic analysis using Y-chromosome STRs. Forensic Sci. Int. 2001;124:5–10
  31. Gill P. An assessment of the utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for forensic purposes. Int. J. Legal Med. 2001;114:204–210
  32. Budowle B, Planz JV, Campbell RS, Eisenberg AJ. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and microarray technology in forensic genetics—development and application to mitochondrial DNA. Forensic Sci. Rev. 2004;16:21–36
  33. Sobrino B, Brion M, Carracedo A. SNPs in forensic genetics: a review on SNP typing methodologies. Forensic Sci. Int. 2005;154:181–194
  34. Brenner CH, Weir BS. Issues and strategies in the identification of World Trade Center victims. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2003;63:173–178
  35. Meyer HJ. The Kaprun cable car fire disaster—aspects of forensic organization following a mass fatality with 155 victims. Forensic Sci. Int. 2003;138:1–7
  36. Hsu CM, Huang NE, Tsai LC, Kao LG, Chao CH, Linacre A, et al. Identification of victims of the 1998 Taoyuan Airbus crash accident using DNA analysis. Int. J. Legal Med. 1999;113:43–46
  37. Leclair B, Fregeau CJ, Bowen KL, Fourney RM. Enhanced kinship analysis and STR-based DNA typing for human identification in mass fatality incidents: the Swissair flight 111 disaster. J. Forensic Sci. 2004;49:939–953
  38. Cowell RG, Mostad P. A clustering algorithm using DNA marker information for sub-pedigree reconstruction. J. Forensic Sci. 2003;48:1239–1248
  39. Alonso A, Martin P, Albarran C, Garcia P, Fernandez de Simon L, Iturralde MJ, et al. Challenges in DNA profiling in mass disaster investigations. Croat. Med. J. 2005;46:540–548
  40. Gornik I, Marcikic M, Kubat M, Primorac D, Lauc G. The identification of war victims by reverse paternity is associated with significant risk of false inclusion. Int. J. Legal Med. 2002;116:255–257
  41. Brenner CH. Some mathematical problems in the DNA identification of victims in the 2004 tsunami and similar mass fatalities. Forensic Sci. Int. 2006;157:172–180
  42. Buckleton J, Triggs CM, Clayton T. Disaster victim identification, identification of missing persons, and immigration cases. In:  Buckleton J,  Triggs CM,  Walsh SJ editor. Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2005;
  43. Biesecker LG, Bailey-Wilson JE, Ballantyne J, Baum H, Bieber FR, Brenner C, et al. DNA identifications after the 9/11 World Trade Center attack. Science. 2005;310:1122–1123
  44. Lessig R, Grundmann C, Dahlmann F, Rötzscher K, Edelmann J, Schneider PM. Tsunami 2004—a review of 1 year of continuous forensic medical work for victim identification. EXCLI J. 2006;5:128–139

PII: S1872-4973(06)00003-2

doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2006.10.003

Forensic Science International: Genetics
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 3-12 , March 2007

Article Tools