Forensic Science International: Genetics
Volume 1, Issue 3 , Pages 238-246, December 2007

Use of subpopulation data in Australian forensic DNA casework

  • Simon J. Walsh

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Forensic Science, University of Technology Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
    • Forensic & Technical Services, Australian Federal Police, GPO Box 401, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 62233854; fax: +61 2 6223 3270.
  • ,
  • R. John Mitchell

      Affiliations

    • Department of Genetics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • Fraser Torpy

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Forensic Science, University of Technology Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
  • ,
  • John S. Buckleton

      Affiliations

    • ESR, Private Bag 92-021, Auckland, New Zealand

Received 3 May 2007; accepted 9 May 2007. published online 18 June 2007.

Abstract 

DNA profiling evidence presented in court should be accompanied by a reliable estimate of its evidential weight. In calculating such statistics, allele frequencies from commonly employed autosomal microsatellite loci are required. These allele frequencies should be collected at a level that appropriately represents the genetic diversity that exists in the population. Typically this occurs at broadly defined bio-geographic categories, such as Caucasian or Asian. Datasets are commonly administered at the jurisdictional level. This paper focuses on Australian jurisdictions and assesses whether this current practice is appropriate for Aboriginal Australian and Caucasian populations alike. In keeping with other studies we observe negligible differences between Caucasian populations within Australia when segregated geographically. However segregation of Aboriginal Australian population data along contemporary State and Territory lines appears to mask the diversity that exists within this subpopulation. For this reason datasets collated along more traditional lines may be more appropriate, particularly to distinguish the most genetically differentiated populations residing in the north of the continent.

Keywords: Forensic, DNA profiling, Microsatellites, STR, Population genetics, Heterogeneity, Forensic statistics, Australia, Aboriginal Australians

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1872-4973(07)00080-4

doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.05.001

Forensic Science International: Genetics
Volume 1, Issue 3 , Pages 238-246, December 2007