Forensic Science International: Genetics
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 126-133, March 2008

2006 GEP-ISFG collaborative exercise on mtDNA: reflections about interpretation, artefacts, and DNA mixtures

  • L. Prieto

      Affiliations

    • Comisaría General de Policía Científica, DNA Laboratory, Madrid, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • A. Alonso

      Affiliations

    • Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses, Departamento de Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • C. Alves

      Affiliations

    • Instituto de Patología e Inmunología Molecular IPATIMUP, Universidade do Porto, Portugal
  • ,
  • M. Crespillo

      Affiliations

    • Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses, Departamento de Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • M. Montesino

      Affiliations

    • Comisaría General de Policía Científica, DNA Laboratory, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • A. Picornell

      Affiliations

    • Lab. Genètica, Ins. Universitari d’Investigacions en C.C. de la Salut i Dep. de Biol., Universitat Illes Balears, Spain
  • ,
  • A. Brehm

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorio de Genética Humana, Universidade da Madeira, Portugal
  • ,
  • J.L. Ramírez

      Affiliations

    • Fundación Ins. de Estudios Avanzados, C. Biotecnología, U. Pol. Genéticos, Caracas, Venezuela
  • ,
  • M.R. Whittle

      Affiliations

    • Genomic Engenharia Molecular LTDA, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • M.J. Anjos

      Affiliations

    • Serviço de Genética e Biologia Forense, Inst. Nacional de Med. Legal, Delegação do Centro, Portugal
  • ,
  • I. Boschi

      Affiliations

    • Istituto di Medicina Legale e delle Assicurazioni, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • J. Buj

      Affiliations

    • Neodiagnóstica, Lleida, Spain
  • ,
  • M. Cerezo

      Affiliations

    • Unidade de Xenética, Ins. de Medicina Legal, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain
  • ,
  • S. Cardoso

      Affiliations

    • Banco de ADN, Universidad del País Vasco, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
  • ,
  • R. Cicarelli

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorio de Investigaçáo de Paternidade, Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • ,
  • D. Comas

      Affiliations

    • Unitat de Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • D. Corach

      Affiliations

    • Servicio de Huellas Digitales Genéticas, Fac. Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • ,
  • C. Doutremepuich

      Affiliations

    • Laboratoire D́Hématologie, Bordeaux, France
  • ,
  • R.M. Espinheira

      Affiliations

    • Serviço de Genética e Biologia Forense, Inst. Nacional de Medicina Legal, Delegação do Sul, Portugal
  • ,
  • I. Fernández-Fernández

      Affiliations

    • DataGene, Parque Tecnológico de Derio, Bizkaia, Spain
  • ,
  • S. Filippini

      Affiliations

    • Banco Nacional de Datos Genéticos, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • ,
  • Julia Garcia-Hirschfeld

      Affiliations

    • Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses, Departamento de Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • A. González

      Affiliations

    • ADF TecnoGen, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • B. Heinrichs

      Affiliations

    • Dirección General de la Guardia Civil, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • A. Hernández

      Affiliations

    • Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses, Delegación de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain
  • ,
  • F.P.N. Leite

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorio de Pericias, Instituto Geral de Pericias, Porto Alegre, Brazil
  • ,
  • R.P. Lizarazo

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorio de DNA, Inst. Nacional de Med. Legal y C.C. Forenses, Santafé de Bogotá, Colombia
  • ,
  • A.M. López-Parra

      Affiliations

    • Departamento de Medicina Legal y Forense, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • M. López-Soto

      Affiliations

    • Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses, Departamento de Sevilla, Spain
  • ,
  • J.A. Lorente

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorio de Identificación Genética, Dpto. de Medicina Legal, Universidad de Granada, Spain
  • ,
  • B. Mechoso

      Affiliations

    • Instituto de Genética Médica, Hospital Italiano, Montevideo, Uruguay
  • ,
  • I. Navarro

      Affiliations

    • Centro de Análisis Genéticos C.A.G.T., Zaragoza, Spain
  • ,
  • S. Pagano

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorio Biológico, Dirección Nacional de Policía Técnica, Montevideo, Uruguay
  • ,
  • J.J. Pestano

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorio de Genética, Instituto Anatómico Forense, Las Palmas, Spain
  • ,
  • J. Puente

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorio de Genética Clínica LabGenetics, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • E. Raimondi

      Affiliations

    • PRICAI -Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • ,
  • A. Rodríguez-Quesada

      Affiliations

    • Unidad de Genética Forense, Sección de Bioquímica, Dep. de Ciencias Forenses, Heredia, Costa Rica
  • ,
  • M.F. Terra-Pinheiro

      Affiliations

    • Serviço de Genética e Biologia Forense, Inst. Nacional de Med. Legal, Delegação do Norte, Portugal
  • ,
  • L. Vidal-Rioja

      Affiliations

    • Lab. de Identificación Genética, Ins. Multidisciplinario de Biol. Celular (IMBICE), La Plata, Argentina
  • ,
  • C. Vullo

      Affiliations

    • Laboratorio de Inmunogenética y Diagnostico Molecular, Córdoba, Argentina
  • ,
  • A. Salas

      Affiliations

    • Unidade de Xenética, Ins. de Medicina Legal, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain

Received 26 July 2007; received in revised form 11 September 2007; accepted 2 October 2007.

Abstract 

We report the results of the seventh edition of the GEP-ISFG mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) collaborative exercise. The samples submitted to the participant laboratories were blood stains from a maternity case and simulated forensic samples, including a case of mixture. The success rate for the blood stains was moderate (∼77%); even though four inexperienced laboratories concentrated about one-third of the total errors. A similar success was obtained for the analysis of mixed samples (78.8% for a hair–saliva mixture and 69.2% for a saliva–saliva mixture). Two laboratories also dissected the haplotypes contributing to the saliva–saliva mixture. Most of the errors were due to reading problems and misinterpretation of electropherograms, demonstrating once more that the lack of a solid devised experimental approach is the main cause of error in mtDNA testing.

Keywords: mtDNA, Mixture, Recommendations: Phylogeny, GEP-ISFG, Collaborative exercise

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1872-4973(07)00173-1

doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.10.010

Forensic Science International: Genetics
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 126-133, March 2008