Forensic Science International: Genetics
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 363-371 , September 2008

A novel fluorescence-based method in forensic science for the detection of blood in situ

  • Richard Thorogate

      Affiliations

    • King's College London, Department of Forensic Science and Drug Monitoring, Franklin Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 2078484489; fax: +44 2078484462.
  • ,
  • Joana C.S. Moreira

      Affiliations

    • The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
  • ,
  • Sue Jickells

      Affiliations

    • King's College London, Department of Forensic Science and Drug Monitoring, Franklin Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, UK
  • ,
  • Margherita M.P. Miele

      Affiliations

    • King's College London, Department of Forensic Science and Drug Monitoring, Franklin Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, UK
  • ,
  • Barbara Daniel

      Affiliations

    • King's College London, Department of Forensic Science and Drug Monitoring, Franklin Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, UK

Received 10 December 2007 ,Revised 20 May 2008 ,Accepted 4 June 2008.

References 

  1. Bär W. DNA profiling: evaluation of the evidentiary value. Leg. Med. 2003;5:41–44
  2. Gill P, Whitaker J, Flaxman C, Brown N, Buckleton J. An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100pg of DNA. Forensic Sci. Int. 2000;112:17–40
  3. Kloosterman AD, Kersbergen P. Efficacy and limits of genotyping low copy number DNA samples by multiplex PCR and STR loci. Int. Congr. Ser. 2003;1239:795–798
  4. Smith PJ, Ballantyne J. Simplified low-copy-number DNA analysis by post-PCR purification. J. Forensic Sci. 2007;52:820–829
  5. Quickenden TI, Creamer JI. A study of common interferences with the forensic luminol test for blood. Luminescence. 2001;16:295–298
  6. Barni F, Lewis SW, Berti A, Miskelly GM, Lago G. Forensic application of the luminol reaction as a presumptive test for latent blood detection. Talanta. 2007;72:896–913
  7. Zwedinger RA, Lytle LT, Pitt CG. Photography of bloodstains visualized by luminol. J. Forensic Sci. 1973;18:296–302
  8. Tobe SS, Watson N, Daéid NN. Evaluation of six presumptive tests for blood, their specificity, sensitivity, and effect on high molecular weight DNA. J. Forensic Sci. 2007;52:102–109
  9. Hochmeister MN, Budowle B, Sparkes R, Rudin O, Gehrig C, Thali M, et al. Validation studies of an immunochromatographic 1-step test for the forensic identification of human blood. J. Forensic Sci. 1999;44:597–602
  10. Schweers BA, Old J, Boonlayangoor PW, Reich KA. Developmental validation of a novel lateral flow strip test for rapid identification of human blood (Rapid Stain Identification™-Blood). Forensic Sci. Int. Gen. 2008;2:243–247
  11. Banks PR, Paquette DM. Comparison of three common amine reactive fluorescent probes used for conjugation to biomolecules by capillary zone electrophoresis. Bioconj. Chem. 1995;6:447–458
  12. Riederer BM. Antigen preservation tests for immunocytochemical detection of cytoskeletal proteins: influence of aldehyde fixatives. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1989;37:675–681
  13. Hoetelmans RW, Prins FA, Cornelese-ten Velde I, van der Meer J, van de Velde CJ, van Dierendonck JH. Effects of acetone, methanol, or paraformaldehyde on cellular structure, visualized by reflection contrast microscopy and transmission and scanning electron microscopy. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2001;9:346–351
  14. Yang P. Comparative evaluation of unfixed and fixed human neutrophils for determination of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence. J. Clin. Pathol. 1997;50:677–680
  15. Siebert PD, Fukuda M. Isolation and characterization of human glycophorin A cDNA clones by a synthetic oligonucleotide approach: nucleotide sequence and mRNA structure. Biochemistry. 1986;83:1665–1669
  16. Nakahata T, Okumura N. Cell surface antigen expression in human erythroid progenitors: erythroid and megakaryocytic markers. Leuk. Lymphoma. 1994;13:401–409
  17. Tomita M, Marchesi VT. Amino-acid sequence and oligosaccharide attachment sites of human erythrocyte glycophorin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1975;72:2964–2968
  18. Ngo N, Patel K, Isaacson PG, Naresh KN. Leucocyte common antigen (CD45) and CD5 positivity in an “undifferentiated” carcinoma: a potential diagnostic pitfall. J. Clin. Pathol. 2007;60:936–938
  19. Ohtani H, Wakui K, Komatsuda A, Chyzh KA, Hatakeyama T, Masai R, et al. Differences between myeloperoxidase-specific and -nonspecific P-ANCA-associated renal disease. Ren. Fail. 2007;29:183–187
  20. Klebanoff SJ. Myeloperoxidase: friend or foe. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2005;77:598–625
  21. Taylor MV, Stone JH, Stebbing J, Barin J, Rose NR, Burek CL. Antibodies to selected minor target antigens in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA). Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2007;150:42–48
  22. Reilly JT. Use and evaluation of leucocyte monoclonal antibodies in the diagnostic laboratory: a review. Clin. Lab. Haematol. 1996;18:1–5
  23. Shapiro HM. Parameters and probes. In:  Shapiro HM editors. Practical Flow Cytometry. 2nd ed.. New York: Alan R Liss; 1988;p. 150–152
  24. Parseghian MH, Hamkalo BA. A compendium of the histone H1 family of somatic subtypes: an elusive cast of characters and their characteristics. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2001;79:289–304
  25. Sarg B, Gréen A, Söderkvist P, Helliger W, Rundquist I, Lindner HH. Characterization of sequence variations in human histone H1.2 and H1.4 subtypes. FEBS J. 2005;272:3673–3683
  26. Parseghian MH, Clark RF, Hauser LJ, Dvorkin N, Harris DA, Hamkalo BA. Fractionation of human H1 subtypes and characterization of a subtype-specific antibody exhibiting non-uniform nuclear staining. Chromosome Res. 1993;1:127–139
  27. Lennox RW. Differences in evolutionary stability among mammalian H1 subtypes. Implications for the roles of H1 subtypes in chromatin. J. Biol. Chem. 1984;259:669–672
  28. Staiti N, Giuffrè G, Di Martino D, Simone A, Sippelli G, Tuccari G, et al. Molecular analysis of genomic low copy number DNA extracted from laser-microdissected cells. Int. Congr. Ser. 2006;1288:568–570
  29. Zhang X, Gabriel MS, Zini A. Sperm nuclear histone to protamine ratio in fertile and infertile men: evidence of heterogeneous subpopulations of spermatozoa in the ejaculate. J. Androl. 2006;27:414–420
  30. Mudrak O, Tomilin N, Zalensky A. Chromosome architecture in the decondensing human sperm nucleus. J. Cell Sci. 2005;118:4541–4550

PII: S1872-4973(08)00088-4

doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.06.003

Forensic Science International: Genetics
Volume 2, Issue 4 , Pages 363-371 , September 2008