Forensic Science International: Genetics
Volume 3, Issue 2 , Pages 74-79 , March 2009

Novel methods of molecular sex identification from skeletal tissue using the amelogenin gene

  • Victoria Gibbon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Rd, Johannesburg, 2193 Parktown, South Africa
    • School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Rd, Johannesburg, 2193 Parktown, South Africa
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Rd, Johannesburg, 2193 Parktown, South Africa. Tel.: +27 11 488 3632.
  • ,
  • Maria Paximadis

      Affiliations

    • AIDS Virus Research Unit, National Institute of Communicable Diseases, Sandringham, Johannesburg, South Africa
  • ,
  • Goran Štrkalj

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health and Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
  • ,
  • Paul Ruff

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Rd, Johannesburg, 2193 Parktown, South Africa
  • ,
  • Clem Penny

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Rd, Johannesburg, 2193 Parktown, South Africa

Received 3 July 2008 ,Revised 22 September 2008 ,Accepted 15 October 2008.

References 

  1. Kaestle FA, Horsburgh KA. Ancient DNA anthropology: methods, applications, and ethics. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 2002;45:92–130
  2. France DL. Observational and metric analysis of sex in the skeleton. In:  Reichs K,  Bass W editor. Forensic Osteology. Illinois: Charles C. Thomas Publishing; 1998;p. 163–186
  3. Faerman M, Filon D, Kahila G, Greenblatt CL, Smith P, Oppenheim A. Sex identification of archaeological human remains based on amplification of the X and Y amelogenin alleles. Gene. 1995;167:327–332
  4. Woodward VE, Penny CB, Ruff P, Štrkalj G. Intercondylar fossa of the femur: a novel region for DNA extraction. S. Afr. Archaeol. Bull. 2006;61:96–97
  5. O’Rourke DH, Hayes MG, Carlyle SW. Ancient DNA studies in physical anthropology. Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 2000;29:217–242
  6. Hagelberg E, Clegg JB. Isolation and characterization of DNA from archaeological bone. Proc. Biol. Sci. 1991;244:45–50
  7. Höss M, Pääbo S. DNA extraction from pleistocene bones by a silica-based purification method. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21:3913–3914
  8. Yang DY, Eng B, Waye JS, Dudar JC, Saunders SR. Technical note: improved DNA extraction from ancient bones using silica-based spin columns. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1998;105:539–543
  9. Kolman CJ, Tuross N. Ancient DNA analysis of human populations. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2000;111:5–23
  10. Zoledziewska M, Gronkiewicz S, Dobosz T. Comparison of various decalificators in preparation of DNA from human rib bones. Anthropol. Rev. 2002;65:75–80
  11. Fletcher HA, Donoghue HD, Holton J, Pap I, Spigelman M. Widespread occurrence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA from 18th–19th century Hungarians. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2003;120:144–152
  12. Holland MM, Cave CA, Holland CA, Bille TW. Development of a quality, high throughput DNA analysis procedure for skeletal samples to assist with the identification of victims from the World Trade Center attacks. Croat. Med. J. 2003;44:264–272
  13. Bille T, Wingrove R, Holland M, Cave C, Schumm J. Novel method of DNA extraction from bones assisted DNA identification of world trade center victims. Int. Congr. Ser. 2004;1261:553–555
  14. Cattaneo C, Craig OE, James NT, Sokol RJ. Comparison of three DNA extraction methods on bone and blood stains up to 43 years old and amplification of three different gene sequences. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1997;42:1126–1135
  15. Faerman M, Bar-Gal GK. Determining the sex of infanticide victims from the late Roman era through ancient DNA analysis. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1998;25:861–865
  16. Cipollaro M, Bernardo GD, Galano G, Galderisi U, Guarino F, Angelini F, et al. Ancient DNA in human bone remains from Pompeii archaeological site. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998;247:901–904
  17. Meyer E, Wiese M, Bruchhaus H, Claussen M, Klein A. Extraction and amplification of authentic DNA from ancient human remains. Forensic Sci. Int. 2000;113:87–90
  18. Sivagami AV, Rajeswara Rao A, Varshney U. A simple and cost-effective method for preparing DNA from the hard tooth tissue, and its use in polymerase chain reaction amplification of amelogenin gene segment for sex identification in an Indian population. Forensic Sci. Int. 2000;110:107–115
  19. Matheson CD, Loy TH. Genetic sex identification of 9400-year-old human skull samples from Ćayönü, Turkey. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2001;28:569–575
  20. Alonso A, Martín P, Albarrán C, García P, García O, de Simón LF, et al. Real-time PCR designs to estimate nuclear DNA and mitochondrial DNA copy number in forensic and ancient DNA studies. Forensic Sci. Int. 2004;139:141–149
  21. Fredsted T, Villesen P. Fast and reliable sexing of prosimian and human DNA. Am. J. Primatol. 2004;64:345–350
  22. Arnay-de-le-Rosa M, Ginzález-Reimers E, Fregel R, Velasco-Vázquez J, Delgado-Darias T, González AM, et al. Canary islands aborigin sex identification based on mandible parameters contrasted by amelogenin analysis. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2007;34:1515–1522
  23. Haas-Rochholz H, Weiler G. Additional primer sets for an amelogenin gene PCR-based DNA-sex test. Int. J. Leg. Med. 1997;110:312–315
  24. Chen E, Yuan ZA, Collier PM, Greene SR, Abrams WR, Gibson CW. Comparison of upstream regions of X-and Y-chromosomal amelogenin genes. Gene. 1998;216:131–137
  25. Buel E, Wang G, Schwartz M. PCR amplification of animal DNA with human X–Y amelogenin primers used in gender identification. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1995;40:641–644
  26. Ensembl Genome Browser n.d. ‘Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and EB-Eye Search’ http://www.ensembl.org/index.html.
  27. Cooper A, Poinar H. Ancient DNA: do it right or not at all. Science. 2000;289:1139–1142
  28. Schmidt T, Hummel S, Herrman B. Evidence of contamination in PCR laboratory disposables. Naturwissenschaften. 1995;82:423–431
  29. Kemp BM, Smith DG. Use of bleach to eliminate contaminating DNA from the surface of bones and teeth. Forensic Sci. Int. 2005;154:53–61
  30. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:12
  31. Pääbo S, Poinar H, Serre D, Jaenicke-Després V, Hebler J, Rohland N, et al. Genetic analysis from ancient DNA. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2004;38:645–679
  32. Mannucci A, Sullivan KM, Ivanov PL, Gill P. Forensic application of a rapid and quantitative DNA sex test by amplification of the X–Y homologous gene amelogenin. J. Leg. Med. 1994;106:190–193
  33. Zoledziewska M, Jonkisz A, Lebioda A, Bartnik B, Kowalczyk E, Dmochowska G, et al. Three points of detection of short fragments derived from the amelogenin gene for gender identification-new possibilities for the capillary electrophoresis system. Int. Congr. Ser. 2004;1261:619–621

PII: S1872-4973(08)00147-6

doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2008.10.007

Forensic Science International: Genetics
Volume 3, Issue 2 , Pages 74-79 , March 2009