Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing
Received 15 April 2009; received in revised form 30 June 2009; accepted 17 July 2009. published online 17 August 2009.
Abstract
In the examination of sexual assault cases, DNA typing of vaginal samples mostly occurs after differential DNA extraction. Notwithstanding the differential extraction method, the DNA profiles from the seminal fraction often show the male alleles at low-level in combination with female alleles. This unfavorable ratio male to female DNA is due to a limited amount of sperm cells and an overwhelming quantity of female cells. In this study, we compared standard cotton and nylon flocked swabs for post-coital vaginal sampling. Twelve couples donated 88 vaginal swabs – 44 cotton, 44 nylon flocked – which were taken with a time since intercourse (TSI) up to 84h. These vaginal swabs were sorted into categories on the basis of the TSI and submitted to (1) microscopic examination for the presence of male cells, (2) presumptive tests for the detection of seminal fluid and (3) DNA typing. Cellular elution was found to be 6-fold more efficient from the nylon flocked swabs. This makes microscopic analysis less time consuming as the higher cell yield and better cell morphology simplify detection of male cells. Both swab types reveal similar results regarding presumptive tests and male DNA typing. Positive presumptive tests (RSID-semen and PSA) were obtained up to 60h TSI and male autosomal profiles up to 72h TSI. Interestingly, over 50% of the samples negative for both presumptive tests resulted in informative male STR profiles. After differential extraction, less DNA was left on the nylon flocked swabs and more male DNA was isolated. Our results imply that the use of nylon flocked swabs for vaginal sampling will improve microscopic analysis and DNA typing in the medical forensic investigation of sexual assault cases.
aDepartment of Biology (R&D), Netherlands Forensic Institute, P.O. Box 24044, 2490 AA The Hague, The Netherlands
bInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Master in Forensic Science Program, Amsterdam Professional School of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands