Forensic Science International: Genetics
Volume 5, Issue 3 , Pages 257-258 , June 2011

A comparison of mini-STRs versus standard STRs—Results of a collaborative European (EDNAP) exercise

  • Lindsey Welch

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 141 548 2500.
  • Peter Gill

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Forensic Science, University of Strathclyde, 204 George Street, Glasgow G1 1XW, UK
    • Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Received 26 October 2009

References 

  1. Dixon LA, Dobbins AE, Pulker HK, et al. Analysis of artificially degraded DNA using STRs and SNPs—results of a collaborative European (EDNAP) exercise. Forensic Sci. Int. 2006;164(1):33–44
  2. Schneider PM, Bender K, Mayr WR, et al. STR analysis of artificially degraded DNA-results of a collaborative European exercise. Forensic Sci. Int. 2004;139(2/3):123–134
  3. Gill P, Whitaker J, Flaxman C, et al. An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100pg of DNA. Forensic Sci. Int. 2000;112(1):17–40
  4. Gill P, Fereday L, Morling N, et al. The evolution of DNA databases—recommendations for new European STR loci. Forensic Sci. Int. 2006;156:242–244
  5. Gill P, Fereday L, Morling N, et al. New multiplexes for Europe—amendments and clarification of strategic development. Forensic Sci. Int. 2006;163(1/2):155–157
  6. R. Alaeddini, S.J. Walsh, A. Abbas, Forensic implications of genetic analyses from degraded DNA—a review, Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. Available online 2 October 2009.

PII: S1872-4973(10)00012-8

doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.01.004

Forensic Science International: Genetics
Volume 5, Issue 3 , Pages 257-258 , June 2011

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution