Forensic Science International: Genetics
Volume 6, Issue 3 , Pages 387-392, May 2012

Analysis of matches and partial-matches in a Danish STR data set

  • Torben Tvedebrink

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Fredrik Bajers Vej 7G, DK-9220 Aalborg East, Denmark. Tel.: +45 99408860; fax: +45 98158129.
  • ,
  • Poul Svante Eriksen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University, Denmark
  • ,
  • James Michael Curran

      Affiliations

    • Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand
  • ,
  • Helle Smidt Mogensen

      Affiliations

    • Section of Forensic Genetics, Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • Niels Morling

      Affiliations

    • Section of Forensic Genetics, Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Received 6 December 2010; received in revised form 19 July 2011; accepted 4 August 2011. published online 07 September 2011.

Abstract

Over the recent years, the national databases of STR profiles have grown in size due to the success of forensic DNA analysis in solving crimes. The accumulation of DNA profiles implies that the probability of a random match or near match of two randomly selected DNA profiles in the database increases.

We analysed 53,295 STR profiles from individuals investigated in relation to crime case investigations at the Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Incomplete STR profiles (437 circa 0.8% of the total), 48 redundant STR profiles from monozygotic twins (0.09%), 6 redundant STR profiles of unknown cause and 1283 STR profiles from repeated testing of individuals were removed leaving 51,517 complete 10 locus STR profiles for analysis. The number corresponds to approximately 1% of the Danish population. We compared all STR profiles to each other, i.e. 1.3×109 comparisons.

With these large number of comparisons, it is likely to observe DNA profiles that coincide on many loci, which has concerned some commentators and raised questions about “overstating” the power of DNA evidence. We used the method of Weir and Curran et al. [3] to compare the observed and expected number of matches and near matches in the data set. We extended the methods by computing the covariance matrix of the summary statistic and used it for the estimation of the identical-by-descent parameter, θ. The analysis demonstrated a number of close relatives in the Danish data set and substructure. The main contribution to the substructure comes from close relatives. An overall θ-value of 1% compensated for the observed substructure, when close familial relationships were accounted for.

Keywords: DNA database, θ-Correction, Subpopulation, Close relatives, Covariance matrix

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1872-4973(11)00151-7

doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.08.001

Forensic Science International: Genetics
Volume 6, Issue 3 , Pages 387-392, May 2012