« BackForensic Science International: Genetics
Article in Press

Performance of two 17 locus forensic identification STR kits—Applied Biosystems's AmpFℓSTR® NGMSElect™ and Promega's PowerPlex® ESI17 kits

  • Torben Tvedebrink

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7G, DK-9220 Aalborg East, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +45 99408860.
  • ,
  • Helle Smidt Mogensen

      Affiliations

    • Section of Forensic Genetics, Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederik V's Vej 11, DK-2100 Copenhagen East, Denmark
    • Tel.: +45 35326212.
  • ,
  • Maria Charlotte Stene

      Affiliations

    • Section of Forensic Genetics, Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederik V's Vej 11, DK-2100 Copenhagen East, Denmark
    • Tel.: +45 35326216.
  • ,
  • Niels Morling

      Affiliations

    • Section of Forensic Genetics, Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederik V's Vej 11, DK-2100 Copenhagen East, Denmark
    • Tel.: +45 35326115.

Received 17 October 2011; received in revised form 21 December 2011; accepted 27 December 2011. published online 24 January 2012.
Corrected Proof

Abstract 

We compared the performance of two recently released 17 loci STR multiplexes for human identification: Applied Biosystems's AmpFℓSTR® NGMSElect™ and Promega's PowerPlex® ESI17. The comparative parameters were chosen by their relevance in forensic identification and particularly in crime cases. The comparative analyses encompass: amplification ability, heterozygote balance, allelic drop-out, drop-in, stutter analysis and inter-locus balance.

Four DNA profiles were analysed in various concentrations in a serial dilution experiment. The amounts of DNA in the PCR ranged from 3pg to 420pg and were analysed in triplicate using 28, 29 and 30 PCR cycles. In order to compare the kits, aliquots from each sample were analysed with both kits under identical conditions. Furthermore, DNA profiles from 200 reference profiles were analysed using both kits.

The results from the statistical analyses did not indicate any substantial differences of practical relevance between the kits for forensic case work. For all parameters included in this comparative study, the two kits showed no departure from previously observed patterns relative to e.g. the amounts of DNA or amplicon lengths. Based on our analyses, both kits are considered applicable for forensic crime case work.

Keywords: AmpFℓSTR® NGMSElect™, PowerPlex® ESI17, Stutter analysis, Heterozygote balance, Allelic drop-out, Artefact analysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1872-4973(11)00236-5

doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.12.006

« BackForensic Science International: Genetics