Guidance exists on how to count matches between samples in a crime sample database but we are unable to locate a definition of how to estimate a match rate. We propose a method that does not proceed from the match counting definition but which has a strong logic.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Forensic Science International: Genetics
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Report of the European DNA Profiling Group (EDNAP)—towards standardisation of short tandem repeat (STR) loci.Forensic Science International. 1994; 65: 51-59
- DNA databases for offender identification in Europe—the need for technical, legal and political harmonisation.in: The Second European Symposium on Human Identification, Innsbruck, Austria1998
- Criminal DNA databases: the European situation.Forensic Science International. 2001; 119: 232-238
- A brief history of the formation of DNA databases in forensic science within Europe.Forensic Science International. 2001; 119: 225-231
Senior Managers Australia and New Zealand Forensic Laboratories. SMANZFL Rules for DNA Database link statistics, 2007.
ENFSI DNA Working Group, DNA-Database Management Review and Recommendations, 2008: http://www.enfsi.eu/page.php?uid=98, accessed July 29th, 2008.
Published online: January 20, 2009
Accepted: December 3, 2008
Received in revised form: November 17, 2008
Received: October 7, 2008
© 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.