Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 4, ISSUE 1, P26-33, December 2009

Trace evidence characteristics of DNA: A preliminary investigation of the persistence of DNA at crime scenes

      Abstract

      The successful recovery of trace or contact DNA is highly variable. It is seemingly dependent on a wide range of factors, from the characteristics of the donor, substrate and environment, to the delay between contact and recovery. There is limited research on the extent of the effect these factors have on trace DNA analysis. This study investigated the persistence of trace DNA on surfaces relevant to the investigation of burglary and robbery offences.
      The study aimed to limit the number of variables involved to solely determine the effect of time on DNA recovery. Given that it is difficult to control the quantity of DNA deposited during a hand contact, human buffy coat and DNA control solution were chosen as an alternative to give a more accurate measure of quantity. Set volumes of these solutions were deposited onto outdoor surfaces (window frames and vinyl material to mimic burglary and ‘bag snatch’ offences) and sterile glass slides stored in a closed environment in the laboratory, for use as a control. Trace DNA casework data was also scrutinised to assess the effect of time on DNA recovery from real samples.
      The amount of DNA recovered from buffy coat on the outdoor surfaces declined by approximately half over two weeks, to a negligible amount after six weeks. Profiles could not be obtained after two weeks. The samples stored in the laboratory were more robust, and full profiles were obtained after six weeks, the longest time period tested in these experiments. It is possible that profiles may be obtained from older samples when kept in similarly favourable conditions.
      The experimental results demonstrate that the ability to recover DNA from human cells on outdoor surfaces decreases significantly over two weeks. Conversely, no clear trends were identified in the casework data, indicating that many other factors are involved affecting the recovery of trace DNA. Nevertheless, to ensure that valuable trace evidence is not lost, it is recommended that crime scenes are processed expeditiously.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Forensic Science International: Genetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Van Oorschot R.A.
        • Jones M.
        DNA fingerprints from fingerprints.
        Nature. 1997; 387: 767
        • Balogh M.K.
        • Burger J.
        • Bender K.
        • Schneider P.M.
        • Alt K.W.
        Fingerprints from fingerprints.
        International Congress Series, Progress in Forensic Genetics 9. 2003; 1239: 953-957
        • Wickenheiser R.A.
        Trace DNA: a review, discussion of theory, and application of the transfer of trace quantities of DNA through skin contact.
        Journal of Forensic Science. 2002; 47: 442-450
        • Gunn B.
        An intelligence-led approach to policing in England and Wales and the impact of developments in forensic science.
        The Australian Journal of Forensic Science. 2003; 35: 149-160
      1. D. Coleman, S. Hyde, I. Gordon, T. Wilson, D. Werrett, S. Bain, et al. The National DNA Database Annual Report 03/04. 2004 [cited 24.2.08]; available from: www.forensic.gov.uk/forensic_t/inside/about/docs/NDNAD_AR_3_4.pdf.

        • Harbison S.A.
        • Hamilton J.F.
        • Walsh S.J.
        The New Zealand DNA databank: its development and significance as a crime solving tool.
        Science and Justice. 2001; 41: 33-38
        • Voegeli P.
        • Haas C.
        • Kratzer A.
        • Bar W.
        Evaluation of the 4-year test period of the Swiss DNA database.
        International Congress Series, Progress in Forensic Genetics 11. 2006; 1288: 731-733
        • Walsh S.J.
        • Buckleton J.S.
        DNA intelligence databases.
        in: Buckleton J.S. Triggs C.M. Walsh S.J. Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL2005: 439-469
        • Schneider P.M.
        • Martin P.D.
        Criminal DNA databases: the European situation.
        Forensic Science International. 2001; 119: 232-238
        • Rutty G.N.
        An investigation into the transfer and survivability of human DNA following simulated manual strangulation with consideration of the problem of third party contamination.
        International Journal of Legal Medicine. 2002; 116: 170-173
        • Gill P.
        • Kirkham A.
        Development of a simulation model to assess the impact of contamination in casework using STRs.
        Journal of Forensic Science. 2004; 49: 7
        • Rudin N.
        • Inman K.
        Biological evidence as trace evidence: the forensic science of DNA typing.
        CAC News. 2002; 4th Qtr.: 19-21
        • Raymond J.J.
        • Walsh S.J.
        • Van Oorschot R.A.
        • Gunn P.
        • Roux C.
        Trace DNA: an underutilised resource or Pandora's box? A review of the use of trace DNA analysis in the investigation of volume crime.
        Journal of Forensic Identification. 2004; 54: 668-686
        • Petterd C.I.
        • Hamshere J.
        • Stewart S.
        • Brinch K.
        • Masi T.
        • Roux C.
        Glass particles in the clothing of members of the public in south-eastern Australia—a survey.
        Forensic Science International. 1999; 103: 193-198
        • Roux C.
        • Kirk R.
        • Benson S.
        • Van Haren T.
        • Petterd C.I.
        Glass particles in footwear of members of the public in south-eastern Australia—a survey.
        Forensic Science International. 2001; 116: 149-156
        • Curran J.M.
        • Triggs C.M.
        • Buckleton J.S.
        • Walsh K.
        • Hicks T.
        Assessing transfer probabilities in a Bayesian interpretation of forensic glass evidence.
        Science and Justice. 1998; 38: 15-21
        • Coulson S.A.
        • Buckleton J.S.
        • Gummer A.B.
        • Triggs C.M.
        Glass on clothing and shoes of members of the general population and people suspected of breaking crimes.
        Science and Justice. 2001; 41: 39-48
        • Taroni F.
        • Aitken C.G.
        Probabilistic reasoning in the law Part 2: assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of trace evidence other than DNA.
        Science and Justice. 1998; 38: 179-188
        • Curran J.M.
        • Hicks T.N.
        • Buckleton J.S.
        Forensic Interpretation of Glass Evidence.
        CRC Press, London2000
      2. R v Joyce, NTSC: Supreme Court of the Northern Territory, 2002, unreported.

      3. Bail application by Hillier, ACTSC, 2003.

        • Van Oorschot R.A.
        • Phelan D.G.
        • Furlong S.
        • Scarfo G.M.
        • Holding N.L.
        • Cummins M.J.
        Are you collecting all the available DNA from touched objects?.
        International Congress Series, Progress in Forensic Genetics 9. 2003; 1239: 803-807
        • Pang B.C.M.
        • Cheung B.K.K.
        Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.
        Legal Medicine. 2007; 9: 181-184
        • Lowe A.
        • Murray C.
        • Whitaker J.
        • Tully G.
        • Gill P.
        The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals to inert surfaces.
        Forensic Science International. 2002; 129: 25-34
        • Phipps M.
        • Petricevic S.F.
        The tendency of individuals to transfer DNA to handled items.
        Forensic Science International. 2006; 168: 162-168
        • Raymond J.J.
        • Walsh S.J.
        • Van Oorschot R.A.
        • Gunn P.R.
        • Evans L.
        • Roux C.
        Assessing trace DNA evidence from a residential burglary: abundance, transfer and persistence.
        in: 22nd Congress of the International Society for Forensic Genetics, 2007, Copenhagen, Denmark2007
      4. Crime victims and the prevention of residential burglary. 2004 [cited 2008 17/3]; available from: www.jcs.act.gov.au/eLibrary/OtherReports/Burglary_Victims_Report.pdf.

      5. F. Kasses, Pers. comm., Sydney Luggage Centre, 2008.

      6. Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology: Sydney, NSW, November and December 2007 Daily Weather Observations. 2007 [cited 2008 24.2]; available from: www.bom.gov.au.

        • Sweet D.
        • Lorente M.
        • Lorente J.
        • Valenzuela A.
        • Villaneuva E.
        An improved method to recover saliva from human skin: the double swab technique.
        Journal of Forensic Science. 1997; 42: 320-322
        • Alessandrini F.
        • Cecati M.
        • Pesaresi M.
        • Turchi C.
        • Carle F.
        • Tagliabracci A.
        Fingerprints as evidence for a genetic profile: morphological study on fingerprints and analysis of exogenous and individual factors affecting DNA typing.
        Journal of Forensic Science. 2003; 48: 586-592
        • Leemans P.
        • Vandeput A.
        • Vanderheyden N.
        • Cassiman J.-J.
        • Decorte R.
        Evaluation of methodology for the isolation and analysis of LCN-DNA before and after dactyloscopic enhancement of fingerprints.
        International Congress Series. 2006; 1288: 583-585