Abstract
Laboratories employ various approaches to ensure that their consumables are free of
DNA contamination. They may purchase pre-treated consumables, perform quality control
checks prior to casework, and use in-house profile databases for contamination detection.
It is better to prevent contamination prior to DNA typing than identify it after samples
are processed. To this end, laboratories may UV irradiate or autoclave consumables
prior to use but treatment procedures are typically based on killing microorganisms
and not on the elimination of DNA. We report a systematic study of UV and autoclave
treatments on the persistence of DNA from saliva. This study was undertaken to determine
the best decontamination strategy for the removal of DNA from laboratory consumables.
We have identified autoclave and UV irradiation procedures that can eliminate nanogram
quantities of contaminating DNA contained within cellular material. Autoclaving is
more effective than UV irradiation because it can eliminate short fragments of contaminating
DNA more effectively. Lengthy autoclave or UV irradiation treatments are required.
Depending on bulb power, a UV crosslinker may take a minimum of 2 h to achieve an effective dose for elimination of nanogram quantities of contaminating
DNA (>7250 mJ/cm2). Similarly autoclaving may also take 2 h to eliminate similar quantities of contaminating DNA. For this study, we used dried
saliva stains to determine the effective dose. Dried saliva stains were chosen because
purified DNA as well as fresh saliva are less difficult to eradicate than dried stains
and also because consumable contamination is more likely to be in the form of a collection
of dry cells.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Forensic Science International: GeneticsAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- New developments and challenges in the use of the UK DNA Database: addressing the issue of contaminated consumables.Forensic Sci Int. 2004; 146S: S175-S176
D. Figarelli, DNA amplification, DNA Analyst Training http://www.nfstc.org/pdi/Subject04/pdi_s04_m04_01_b.htm.
- Failure of ultra-violet irradiation and autoclaving to eliminate PCR contamination.Mol Cell Probes. 1992; 6: 87-88
- The application of ultraviolet irradiation to exogenous sources of DNA in plasticware and water for the amplification of low copy number DNA.J Forensic Sci. 2006; 51: 790-794
- Characterization of UVC-induced DNA damage in bloodstains: forensic implications.Anal Bioanal Chem. 2004; 380: 72-83
- The effectiveness of protective clothing in the reduction of potential DNA contamination of the scene of crime.Int J Legal Med. 2003; 117: 170-174
- Comparison of the effects of sterilization techniques on subsequent DNA profiling.Int J Legal Med. 2008; 122: 29-33
- UV irradiation of polystyrene pipets releases PCR inhibitors.Biotechniques. 1998; 24: 50-52
- UV light irradiation of plastic reaction tubes inhibits PCR.Biotechniques. 1999; 27 (tables and figures): 252-256
Article info
Publication history
Published online: July 23, 2009
Accepted:
June 16,
2009
Received in revised form:
May 14,
2009
Received:
February 27,
2009
Identification
Copyright
© 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.