Advertisement
Forensic Population Genetics—Short Communication| Volume 6, ISSUE 2, e63-e65, March 2012

Download started.

Ok

Genetic data from 15 STR loci for forensic individual identification and parentage analyses in UK domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)

      Abstract

      Eighteen STR loci and one sex determination locus present in the Finnzymes Canine 2.1 STR Multiplex Reagent Kit were screened in the UK dog population providing allele frequencies and population genetic parameters necessary for the application of STRs to forensic genetic casework. A total of 375 dogs were genotyped, including representative samples from each of twelve breeds used to evaluate Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and calculate inter-population pairwise FST values. Three loci were excluded from calculations of average random match probability due to deviations from Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium or ambiguous genotyping. Random match probability based on fifteen STR loci and one sex locus was subsequently estimated to be 2.8 × 10−17 for unrelated individuals across breeds.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Forensic Science International: Genetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kanthaswamy S.
        • Tom B.K.
        • Mattila A.-M.
        • Johnston E.
        • Dayton M.
        • Kinaga J.
        • Joy-Alise Erickson B.
        • Halverson J.
        • Fantin D.
        • DeNise S.
        • Kou A.
        • Malladi V.
        • Satkoski J.
        • Budowle B.
        • Glenn Smith D.
        • Koskinen M.T.
        Canine population data generated from a multiplex STR kit for use in forensic casework.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2009; 54: 829-840https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01080
        • Dayton M.
        • Koskinen M.T.
        • Tom B.K.
        • Mattila A.M.
        • Johnston E.
        • Halverson J.
        • Fantin D.
        • DeNise S.
        • Budowle B.
        • Smith D.G.
        • Kanthaswamy S.
        Developmental validation of short tandem repeat reagent kit for forensic DNA profiling of canine biological material.
        Croat. Med. J. 2009; 50: 268-285
        • Tom B.K.
        • Koskinen M.T.
        • Dayton M.
        • Mattila A.M.
        • Johnston E.
        • Fantin D.
        • Denise S.
        • Spear T.
        • Smith D.G.
        • Satkoski J.
        • Budowle B.
        • Kanthaswamy S.
        Development of a nomenclature system for a canine STR multiplex reagent kit.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2010; 55: 597-604
        • Raymond M.
        • Rousset F.
        GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism.
        J. Heredity. 1995; 86: 248-249
      1. A. Tereba, Tools for Analysis of Population Statistics, Profiles in DNA 3, Promega Corporation, 1999 (www.promega.com/geneticidtools/powerstats/).

        • Peakall R.
        • Smouse P.E.
        GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research.
        Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2006; 6: 288-295
        • van Asch B.
        • Pereira F.
        State-of-the-art and future prospects of canine STR-based genotyping.
        Open Forensic Sci. J. 2010; 3 (45): 45-52
        • Balding D.J.
        • Nichols R.A.
        DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 1994; 64: 125-140
        • Dawnay N.
        • Ogden R.
        • Thorpe R.S.
        • Pope L.C.
        • Dawson D.A.
        • McEwing R.
        A forensic STR profiling system for the Eurasian badger: a framework for developing profiling systems for wildlife species.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2008; 2: 47-53
        • Calboli F.C.F.
        • Sampson J.
        • Fretwell N.
        • Balding D.J.
        Population structure and inbreeding from pedigree analysis of purebred dogs.
        Genetics. 2008; 179: 593-601
        • Ayres K.L.
        • Overall A.D.J.
        Allowing for within-subpopulation inbreeding in forensic match probabilities.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 1999; 103: 207-216
        • Schneider P.M.
        Scientific standards for studies in forensic genetics.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2007; 165: 238-243
        • Linacre A.
        • Gusmão L.
        • Hecht W.
        • Hellmann A.P.
        • Mayr W.R.
        • Parson W.
        • Prinz M.
        • Schneider P.M.
        • Morling N.
        ISFG: recommendations regarding the use of non-human (animal) DNA in forensic genetic investigations.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2010; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.10.017
        • Carracedo A.
        • Butler J.M.
        • Gusmão L.
        • Parson W.
        • Roewer L.
        • Schneider P.M.
        Publication of population data for forensic purposes.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2010; 4: 145-147