Advertisement
Short Communication| Volume 10, P33-39, May 2014

Internal validation of the GlobalFiler™ Express PCR Amplification Kit for the direct amplification of reference DNA samples on a high-throughput automated workflow

  • Shahida Flores
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 817 735 2292; fax: +1 817 735 5016.
    Affiliations
    Institute of Applied Genetics, Department of Forensics and Investigative Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jie Sun
    Affiliations
    Institute of Applied Genetics, Department of Forensics and Investigative Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jonathan King
    Affiliations
    Institute of Applied Genetics, Department of Forensics and Investigative Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Bruce Budowle
    Affiliations
    Institute of Applied Genetics, Department of Forensics and Investigative Genetics, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA

    Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research (CEGMR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 31, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.01.005

      Abstract

      The GlobalFiler™ Express PCR Amplification Kit uses 6-dye fluorescent chemistry to enable multiplexing of 21 autosomal STRs, 1 Y-STR, 1 Y-indel and the sex-determining marker amelogenin. The kit is specifically designed for processing reference DNA samples in a high throughput manner. Validation studies were conducted to assess the performance and define the limitations of this direct amplification kit for typing blood and buccal reference DNA samples on various punchable collection media. Studies included thermal cycling sensitivity, reproducibility, precision, sensitivity of detection, minimum detection threshold, system contamination, stochastic threshold and concordance. Results showed that optimal amplification and injection parameters for a 1.2 mm punch from blood and buccal samples were 27 and 28 cycles, respectively, combined with a 12 s injection on an ABI 3500xL Genetic Analyzer. Minimum detection thresholds were set at 100 and 120 RFUs for 27 and 28 cycles, respectively, and it was suggested that data from positive amplification controls provided a better threshold representation. Stochastic thresholds were set at 250 and 400 RFUs for 27 and 28 cycles, respectively, as stochastic effects increased with cycle number. The minimum amount of input DNA resulting in a full profile was 0.5 ng, however, the optimum range determined was 2.5–10 ng. Profile quality from the GlobalFiler™ Express Kit and the previously validated AmpFlSTR® Identifiler® Direct Kit was comparable. The validation data support that reliable DNA typing results from reference DNA samples can be obtained using the GlobalFiler™ Express PCR Amplification Kit.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Forensic Science International: Genetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Butler J.M.
        Genetics and genomics of core short tandem repeat loci used in human identity testing.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2006; 51: 253-265
        • Wang D.Y.
        • Chang C.W.
        • Legace R.E.
        • Oldroyd N.J.
        • Hennessy L.K.
        Development and validation of the AmpFlSTR Identifiler Direct PCR Amplification Kit: a multiplex assay for the direct amplification of single-source samples.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2011; 56: 835-845
        • Park S.J.
        • Kim J.Y.
        • Yang Y.G.
        • Lee S.H.
        Direct STR amplification from whole blood and blood- or saliva-spotted FTA® without DNA purification.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2008; 53: 335-341
        • Wang D.Y.
        • Chang C.
        • Oldroyd N.
        • Hennessy L.K.
        Direct amplification of STRs from blood or buccal cell samples.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2009; 2: 113-114
        • Myers B.A.
        • King J.L.
        • Budowle B.
        Evaluation and comparative analysis of direct amplification of STRs using PowerPlex® 18D and Identifiler® direct systems.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2012; 6: 640-645
        • Hares D.R.
        Expanding the CODIS core loci in the United States.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2012; 6: e52-e54
        • Gill P.
        • Fereday L.
        • Morling N.
        • Schneider P.M.
        The evolution of DNA databases – recommendations for new European STR loci.
        Forensic Sci. Int. 2006; 156: 242-244
        • Federal Bureau of Investigation
        Quality assurance standards for DNA databasing laboratories.
        Forensic Sci. Commun. 2000; 2 (Available at: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/lab/biometric-analysis/codis/qas_databaselabs.pdf (accessed 07.15.13))
        • Life Technologies
        GlobalFiler™ Express PCR Amplification Kit User Guide.
        Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA2012
        • King J.
        PHASTR (Peak Height Analysis of STRs) Worksheet.
        2013 (Available at: http://web.unthsc.edu/info/200210/molecular_and_medical_genetics/887/research_and_development_laboratory/3)
        • Green R.L.
        • Lagace R.E.
        • Oldroyd N.J.
        • Hennessy L.K.
        • Mulero J.J.
        Developmental validation of the AmpFlSTR® NGM SElect™ PCR Amplification Kit: a next-generation STR multiplex with the SE33 locus.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2013; 7: 41-51
        • Gilder J.R.
        • Doom T.E.
        • Inman K.
        • Krane D.E.
        Run-specific limits of detection and quantitation for STR-based DNA testing.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2007; 52: 97-101
        • Bregu J.
        • Conklin D.
        • Coronado E.
        • Terrill M.
        • Cotton R.W.
        • Grgicak C.M.
        Analytical thresholds and sensitivity establishing RFU thresholds for forensic DNA analysis.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2013; 58: 120-129
        • Kaiser H.
        Report for analytical chemists II. Quantitation in elemental analysis.
        Anal. Chem. 1970; 42: 26A-59A
        • Gill P.
        • Puch-Solis R.
        • Curran J.
        The low-template-DNA (stochastic) threshold – its determination relative to risk analysis for national DNA databases.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2009; 3: 104-111
        • Lee H.C.
        • Ladd C.
        Preservation and collection of biological evidence.
        Croat. Med. J. 2001; 42: 225-228
        • Quinque D.
        • Kittler R.
        • Kayser M.
        • Stoneking M.
        • Nasidze I.
        Evaluation of saliva as a source of human DNA for population and association studies.
        Anal. Biochem. 2006; 353: 272-277
        • Promega Corporation
        Internal Validation Guide of Autosomal STR Systems for Forensic Laboratories.
        2013 (Available at: https://www.promega.com/∼/media/files/resources/validation%20guides/internal%20validation%20of%20autosomal%20str%20systems.pdf?la=en)