Research Article| Volume 16, P77-85, May 2015

Quantifiler® Trio Kit and forensic samples management: A matter of degradation


      • We test the effectiveness of Quantifiler® Trio Kit in detecting DNA degradation.
      • The Quantifiler® Trio Kit is evaluated in combination with Globalfiler® Kit.
      • The Degradation Index is evaluated by studying the peak height decay in the profile.
      • Typing performance was evaluated for different PCR protocols and DI categories.
      • Operative guidelines are proposed to differentiate PCR strategy at increasing of DI.


      DNA collected from crime scenes may have experienced different levels of degradation. This is mainly due to sample exposure to different environmental factors. The impact of DNA degradation on short tandem repeat (STR) profiling can lead to partial or null information and in some cases, the identification of the trace may fail. The availability of a system enabling the assessment not only of the quantity of the DNA but also of its quality in terms of degradation would result in shorter time for sample processing, more reliable identifications and cost reduction by predicting the quality of the DNA profiles prior to STR analysis. We report here a study on 181 selected degraded DNA samples extracted from real crime scene evidence. The selected samples were processed by combining the use of a new commercial quantification kit (Quantifiler® Trio) with a new 24 marker multiplex PCR amplification kit (Globalfiler® Kit). Applying different statistical analyses we investigated the reliability of the Degradation Index provided by the Quantifiler® Trio in determining the level of DNA degradation in a forensic sample. This useful information can be used to predict the quality of the profile obtained after STR amplification. The combination of such a quantification kit with different PCR protocols allowed us to define practical guidelines for processing degraded forensic DNA samples with a simplified and comprehensive approach.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Forensic Science International: Genetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Chung D.T.
        • Drabek J.
        • Opel K.L.
        • Butler J.M.
        • McCord B.R.
        A study of the effects of degradation and template concentration on the amplification efficiency of the miniplex primer sets.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2004; 49: 733-740
        • Tvedebrink T.
        • Eriksen P.S.
        • Mogensen H.S.
        • Morling N.
        Statistical model for degraded DNA samples and adjusted probabilities for allelic drop-out.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2012; 6: 97-101
        • Tvedebrink T.
        • Asplund M.
        • Eriksen P.S.
        • Mogensen H.S.
        • Morling N.
        Estimating drop-out probabilities of STR alleles accounting for stutters: detection threshold truncation and degradation.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. Supp. Ser. 2013; 4: e51-e52
        • Butler J.M.
        • Shen Y.
        • McCord B.R.
        The development of reduced size STR amplicons as tools for analysis of degraded DNA.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2003; 48: 054-64
        • Mulero J.J.
        • Chang C.W.
        • Lagacé R.E.
        • Wang D.Y.
        • Bas J.L.
        • McMahon T.P.
        • Hennessy L.K.
        Development and validation of the AmpFℓSTR® MiniFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit: a MiniSTR multiplex for the analysis of degraded and/or PCR inhibited DNA.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2008; 4: 838-852
        • Tvedebrink T.
        • Mogensen H.S.
        • Stene M.C.
        • Morling N.
        Performance of two 17 locus forensic identification STR kits–applied biosystems’s AmpFℓSTR® NGM SElect™ and Promega’s PowerPlex® ESI17 kits.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2012; 5: 523-531
        • Oh C.S.
        • Lee S.J.
        • Park J.B.
        • Lee S.D.
        • Seo S.B.
        • Kim H.Y.
        • Kim J.
        • Kim Y.S.
        • Shin D.H.
        Autosomal short tandem repeat analysis of ancient DNA by coupled use of mini- and conventional STR kits.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2012; 3: 820-825
        • Buckleton J.
        Validation issues around DNA typing of low level DNA.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2009; 3: 255-260
      1. GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit, User Guide, Lifetechnologies, 2013.

        • Nicklas J.A.
        • Noreault-Conti T.
        • Buel E.
        Development of a real-time method to detect DNA degradation in forensic samples.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2012; 2: 466-471
        • De Leeuw W.
        • Olson S.
        • Green R.
        • Holt A.
        • Schade L.L.
        Development of an innovative DNA quantification and assessment system: streamlining workflow using intelligent tools.
        Forensic Mag. 2013; : 12-15
        • Ballantyne J.
        • Hanson E.
        • Green R.
        • Holt A.
        • Mulero J.
        Enhancing the sexual assault workflow: testing of next generation DNA assessment and Y-STR systems.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. Suppl. Ser. 2013; 4: 228-229
        • Kitayama T.
        • Fujii K.
        • Nakahara H.
        • Mizuno N.
        • Kasai K.
        • Yonezawa N.
        • Sekiguchi K.
        Estimation of the detection rate in STR analysis by determining the DNA degradation ratio using quantitative PCR.
        Legal Med. 2013; 1: 1-6
      2. EZ1® DNA Investigator Handbook, fourth ed., Qiagen, 2009.

      3. PrepFiler® and PrepFiler® BTA Forensic DNA Extraction Kits, User Guide, 2010.

      4. Quantifiler® Trio DNA Quantification Kit, User Manual, 2014.

      5. AmpFlSTR® NGM SElect™ PCR Amplification Kit, User Guide, 2012.

        • Bregu J.
        • Conklin D.
        • Coronado E.
        • Terril M.
        • Cotton R.W.
        • Grgicak C.M.
        Analytical threshold and sensitivity: establishing RFU thresholds for forensic DNA analysis.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2012; 58: 120-129
        • Westen A.A.
        • Grol L.J.
        • Harteveld J.
        • Matai A.S.
        • de Knijff P.
        • Sijen T.
        Assessment of the stochastic threshold, back- and forward stutter filters and low template techniques for NGM.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2012; : 708-715
        • Bright J.A.
        • Turkington J.
        • Bucleton J.
        Examination of the variability in mixed DNA profile parameters for the Identifiler™ multiplex.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2010; 4: 111-114
        • Gill P.
        • Gusmão L.
        • Haned H.
        • Mayr W.R.
        • Morling N.
        • Parson W.
        • Prieto L.
        • Prinz M.
        • Schneider H.
        • Schneider P.M.
        • Weir B.S.
        DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendation on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methods.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2012; 6: 678-688