Research Article| Volume 25, P97-111, November 2016

Cell type determination and association with the DNA donor


      • We present a Bayesian network that can assist in associating donors and cell types.
      • A literature overview on the sensitivity and specificity of three cell type tests.
      • The BN is linked with a software package for interpreting mixed DNA profiles.
      • A sensitivity analysis in order to examine the added value of additional tests.


      In forensic casework, evidence regarding the type of cell material contained in a stain can be crucial in determining what happened. For example, a DNA match in a sexual offense can become substantially more incriminating when there is evidence supporting that semen cells are present.
      Besides the question which cell types are present in a sample, also the question who donated what (association) is very relevant. This question is surprisingly difficult, even for stains with a single donor. The evidential value of a DNA profile needs to be combined with knowledge regarding the specificity and sensitivity of cell type tests. This, together with prior probabilities for the different donor-cell type combinations, determines the most likely combination.
      We present a Bayesian network that can assist in associating donors and cell types. A literature overview on the sensitivity and specificity of three cell type tests (PSA test for seminal fluid, RSID saliva and RSID semen) is helpful in assigning conditional probabilities. The Bayesian network is linked with a software package for interpreting mixed DNA profiles. This allows for a sensitivity analysis that shows to what extent the conclusion depends on the quantity of available research data. This can aid in making decisions regarding further research.
      It is shown that the common assumption that an individual (e.g. the victim) is one of the donors in a mixed DNA profile can have unwanted consequences for the association between donors and cell types.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Forensic Science International: Genetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Gill P.
        Misleading DNA Evidence: Reasons for Miscarriages of Justice.
        1st edition. Elsevier, Oslo2014
        • Taylor D.
        • Abarno D.
        • Hicks T.
        • Champod C.
        Evaluating forensic biology results given source level propositions.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2016; 21: 54-67
        • Oosterman W.T.
        • Kokshoorn B.
        • Maaskant van Wijk P.A.
        • de Zoete J.
        From sub-source to source: interpreting results of biological trace investigations using probabilistic models.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. Suppl. Ser. 2015;
        • R Core Team
        R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
        R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria2015
        • Haned H.
        forensim: Statistical Tools for the Interpretation of Forensic DNA Mixtures. R Package Version 4.3.
        • Taroni F.
        • Bozza S.
        • B. A.
        • Aitken C.
        Dismissal of the illusion of uncertainty in the assessment of a likelihood ratio.
        Law Probab. Risk. 2015;
        • Sjerps M.J.
        • Alberink I.
        • Bolck A.
        • Stoel R.D.
        • Vergeer P.
        • van Zanten J.H.
        Uncertainty and LR: to integrate or not to integrate, that's the question.
        Law Probab. Risk. 2015;
        • Laux D.L.
        • Tambasco A.J.
        • Benzinger E.A.
        Forensic Detection of Semen II. Comparison of the Abacus Diagnostics OneStep ABAcard p30 Test and the Seratec PSA Semiquant Kit for the Determination of the Presence of Semen in Forensic Cases.
        2006 (accessed 09.09.15)
        • Seratec
        PSA in Body Fluids. An Overview of the SERATEC PSA SEMIQUANT Tests.
        • Lövgren J.
        • Valtonen-André C.
        • Marsal K.
        • Liua H.
        • Lundwall Å.
        Measurement of prostate specific antigen and human glandular kallikrein 2 in different body fluids.
        J. Androl. 1999; 20: 348-355
        • Hochmeister M.N.
        • Budowle B.
        • Rudin O.
        • Gehrig C.
        • Borer U.
        • Thali M.
        • Dirnhofer R.
        Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) membrane test assays for the forensic identification of seminal fluid.
        J. Forensic Sci. 1999; 44: 1057-1060
        • Khaldi N.
        • Miras A.
        • Botti K.
        • Benali L.
        • Gromb S.
        Evaluation of three rapid detection methods for the forensic identification of seminal fluid in rape cases.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2004; 49: 749-753
        • Denison S.J.
        • Lopes E.M.
        • D’Costa L.
        • Newman J.C.
        Positive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) results in semen-free samples.
        Can. Soc. Forensic Sci. J. 2004; 37: 197-206
        • Laffan A.
        • Sawyer I.
        • Quinones I.
        • Daniel B.
        Evaluation of semen presumptive tests for use at crime scenes.
        Med. Sci. Law. 2011; 51 (JID: 0400721; EC, (Prostate-Specific Antigen); ppublish): 11-17
        • Macaluso M.
        • Lawson L.
        • Akers R.
        • Valappil T.
        • Hammond K.
        • Blackwell R.
        • Hortin G.
        Prostate-specific antigen in vaginal fluid as a biologic marker of condom failure.
        Contraception. 1999; 59: 195-201
        • Rehan N.
        • Sobrero A.J.
        • Fertig J.W.
        The semen of fertile men: statistical analysis of 1300 men.
        Fertil. Steril. 1975; 26 (LR: 20071115; JID: 0372772; ppublish): 492-502
        • Graves H.C.B.
        • Sensabaugh G.F.
        • Blake E.T.
        Postcoital detection of a male-specific semen protein: application to the investigation of rape.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 1985; 312: 338-343
        • Benschop C.C.G.
        • Wiebosch D.C.
        • Kloosterman A.D.
        • Sijen T.
        Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2010; 4: 115-121
        • Boward E.S.
        • Wilson S.L.
        A comparison of ABAcard® p30 and RSID®-Semen test kits for forensic semen identification.
        J. Forensic Legal Med. 2013; 20: 1126-1130
        • McWilliams S.
        • Gartside B.
        Identification of prostate? Specific antigen and spermatozoa from a mixture of semen and simulated gastric juice.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2009; 54: 610-611
        • Sato I.
        • Sagi M.
        • Ishiwari A.
        • Nishijima H.
        • Ito E.
        • Mukai T.
        Use of the “SMITEST” PSA card to identify the presence of prostate-specific antigen in semen and male urine.
        Forensic Sci. Int. 2002; 127: 71-74
        • Romero-Montoya L.
        • Martínez-Rodríguez H.
        • Antonio Pérez M.
        • Argüello-García R.
        Relationship of spermatoscopy, prostatic acid phosphatase activity and prostate-specific antigen (p30) assays with further DNA typing in forensic samples from rape cases.
        Forensic Sci. Int. 2011; 206: 111-118
        • Pang B.C.M.
        • Cheung B.K.K.
        Identification of human semenogelin in membrane strip test as an alternative method for the detection of semen.
        Forensic Sci. Int. 2007; 169: 27-31
        • Schmidt S.
        • Franke M.
        • Lehmann J.
        • Loch T.
        • Stöckle M.
        • Weichert-Jacobsen K.
        Prostate-specific antigen in female urine: a prospective study involving 217 women.
        Urology. 2001; 57: 717-720
        • Breul J.
        • Pickl U.
        • Hartung R.
        Prostate-specific antigen in urine.
        Eur. Urol. 1994; 26 (LR: 20061115; JID: 7512719; 0 (Tumor Markers, Biological); EC, (Prostate-Specific Antigen); publish): 18-21
        • Zarghami N.
        • Grass L.
        • Sauter E.R.
        • Diamandis E.P.
        Prostate-specific antigen in serum during the menstrual cycle.
        Clin. Chem. 1997; 43 (LR: 20041117; JID: 9421549; 0 (Gonadal Steroid Hormones); EC, (Prostate-Specific Antigen); ppublish): 1862-1867
        • Filella X.
        • Molina R.
        • Alcover J.
        • Carretero P.
        • Ballesta A.M.
        Detection of nonprostatic PSA in serum and nonserum samples from women.
        Int. J. Cancer. 1996; 68: 424-427
        • Mannello F.
        • Bianchi G.
        • Gazzanelli G.
        Immunoreactivity of prostate-specific antigen in plasma and saliva of healthy women.
        Clin. Chem. 1996; 42 (LR: 20041117; JID: 9421549; 0 (Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal); EC, (Prostate-Specific Antigen); ppublish): 1110-1111
        • Bitner S.E.
        False positives observed on the Seratec® PSA SemiQuant cassette test with condom lubricants.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2012; 57: 1545-1548
        • Miteva R.
        • Yotov S.
        • Georgiev P.
        • Fasulkov I.
        Determination of species specificity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in semen.
        Trakia J. Sci. 2006; 4: 64-68
        • Dørum G.
        • Bleka Ø.
        • Gill P.
        • Haned H.
        • Snipen L.
        • Sæbø S.
        • Egeland T.
        Exact computation of the distribution of likelihood ratios with forensic applications.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2014; 9: 93-101
        • Budowle B.
        • Ge J.
        • Chakraborty R.
        • Eisenberg A.J.
        • Green R.
        • Mulero J.
        • Lagace R.
        • Hennessy L.
        Population genetic analyses of the NGM STR loci.
        Int. J. Legal Med. 2011; 125: 101-109
        • Balding D.J.
        Evaluation of mixed-source, low-template DNA profiles in forensic science.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013; 110: 12241-12246
        • Puch-Solis R.
        • Clayton T.
        Evidential evaluation of DNA profiles using a discrete statistical model implemented in the DNA LiRa software.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2014; 11: 220-228
        • Perlin M.W.
        • Legler M.M.
        • Spencer C.E.
        • Smith J.L.
        • Allan W.P.
        • Belrose J.L.
        • Duceman B.W.
        Validating TrueAllele® DNA mixture interpretation.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2011; 56: 1430-1447
        • Højsgaard Søren
        Graphical independence networks with the gRain package for R.
        J. Stat. Softw. 2012; 46: 1-26
        • Haned H.
        • Gill P.
        Analysis of complex {DNA} mixtures using the forensim package.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. Suppl. Ser. 2011; 3: e79-e80
        • Pang B.C.M.
        • Cheung B.K.K.
        Applicability of two commercially available kits for forensic identification of saliva stains.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2008; 53: 1117-1122
        • Casey D.G.
        • Price J.
        The sensitivity and specificity of the RSID™-saliva kit for the detection of human salivary amylase in the Forensic Science Laboratory, Dublin, Ireland.
        Forensic Sci. Int. 2010; 194: 67-71
        • Old J.
        • Schweers B.A.
        • Boonlayangoor P.W.
        • Fischer B.
        • Miller K.W.P.
        • Reich K.
        Developmental validation of RSID™ semen: a lateral flow immunochromatographic strip test for the forensic detection of human semen.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2012; 57: 489-499
        • Breathnach M.
        • Moore E.
        Oral intercourse or secondary transfer? A Bayesian approach of salivary amylase and foreign DNA findings.
        Forensic Sci. Int. 2013; 229: 52-59
        • Carboni I.
        • Rapi S.
        • Ricci U.
        Stability of human α-salivary amylase in aged forensic samples.
        Legal Med. 2014; 16: 214-217
        • Breathnach M.
        • Moore E.
        Background levels of salivary-α-amylase plus foreign DNA in cases of oral intercourse: a female perspective.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2015; 60
        • Trepat E.V.
        • Castelló A.
        More about RSID-saliva: the effect of sample age and the environment on the test's efficacy.
        Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2015; 47: 450-455
        • Martínez P.
        • Santiago B.
        • Alcalá B.
        • Atienza I.
        Semen searching when sperm is absent.
        Sci. Just. 2015; 55: 118-123
        • Yokota M.
        • Mitani T.
        • Tsujita H.
        • Kobayashi T.
        • Higuchi T.
        • Akane A.
        • Nasu M.
        Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) membrane test for forensic examination of semen.
        Legal Med. 2001; 3: 171-176
        • Sijen T.
        Vervanging PSA-test.
        2008 (unpublished internal validation)
        • Kafarowski E.
        • Dann K.
        • Frappier J.R.H.
        • Newman J.C.
        Examination of semen-free vaginal swabs for p30 using the SERATEC® PSA test kit: a further evaluation of the specificity of p30/PSA for semen identification.
        in: MAAFS, MAFS, SAFS, CSFS Joint Meeting. 2004: 19-24
        • Sato I.
        • Kojima K.
        • Yamasaki T.
        • Yoshida K.
        • Yoshiike M.
        • Takano S.
        • Mukai T.
        • Iwamoto T.
        Rapid detection of semenogelin by one-step immunochromatographic assay for semen identification.
        J. Immunol. Methods. 2004; 287: 137-145
        • Sijen T.
        • de Jong B.
        Validate Rapid Stain Identification Semen test.
        2008 (unpublished internal validation)
        • Chang M.E.
        A Comparison of Rapid Stain Identification Test for Semen (RSID™-Semen), Seratec® PSA Semiquant, and ABAcard® p30 Tests for the Forensic Identification of Seminal Fluid.
        • Nakanishi H.
        • Hara M.
        • Takahashi S.
        • Takada A.
        • Saito K.
        Evaluation of forensic examination of extremely aged seminal stains.
        Legal Med. 2014; 16: 303-307
        • Netherlands Forensic Institute
        Validatierapport RSID Saliva.
        • Park H.-Y.
        • Son B.-N.
        • Seo Y.-I.
        • Lim S.-K.
        Comparison of four saliva detection methods to identify expectorated blood spatter.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2015; 60
        • Makkinga W.
        • Drenth-de Boer H.
        • van Esch S.
        • Otte R.
        • Zuidberg M.
        Validatierapport RSID™ Saliva Field Kit Algemeen. Technical report.
        Netherlands Forensic Institute, 2009, September
        • Rosalia R.
        Validation Studies of a Novel Lateral Flow Strip Test for Rapid Stain Identification of Body Fluids at Local Conditions: From Laboratory Testing to Non-Destructive Rapid Confirmatory Identification at a Crime Scene. Master's thesis.
        University of Amsterdam, 2010, July