Advertisement
Research paper| Volume 25, P157-165, November 2016

Novel identification of biofluids using a multiplex methylation sensitive restriction enzyme-PCR system

Published:September 02, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.08.011

      Highlights

      • A new 10-plex MSRE-PCR system was established to identify the body fluids of venous blood, semen, saliva, vaginal fluids and menstrual blood.
      • The validation of the 10-plex MSRE-PCR system showed that 0.25 ng DNA was sufficient to obtain reproducible identification of biofluid types.
      • The MSRE-PCR system and AmpFlSTR® MiniFiler™ were co-amplified in a single reaction to generate both biofluid and miniSTR profiles.

      Abstract

      The identification of a specific body fluid encountered in a forensic investigation can give crucial information. This identification can be aided by methylation profiles based on selected markers specific to a range of biofluids. In this study, the open database of Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip was searched for markers specific for semen, vaginal fluids, saliva, venous blood and menstrual blood. A total of 8 biofluid-specific methylated markers and 2 control markers were combined into a 10-plex methylation sensitive restriction enzyme-PCR (MSRE-PCR) system. Based upon the analysis of 100 DNA samples from these 5 biofluid types, unambiguous results were obtained to identify the body fluid from which it originated. Validation studies of the developed 10-plex MSRE-PCR included sensitivity, reproducibility and mixed body fluids. Co-amplification of the established MSRE-PCR system and the microsatellite loci in AmpFlSTR® MiniFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit was performed to generate both the methylation profile for biofluid type and the miniSTR profile. This allowed human identification and the identification of the body fluid type to be performed in a single reaction. The results of this study displayed the applicability of this 10-plex MSRE-PCR system in forensic science.

      Graphical abstract

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Forensic Science International: Genetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Virkler K.
        • Lednev I.K.
        Analysis of body fluids for forensic purposes: from laboratory testing to non-destructive rapid confirmatory identification at a crime scene.
        Forensic Sci. Int. 2009; 188: 1-17
        • Yokota M.
        • Mitani T.
        • Tsujita H.
        • Kobayashi T.
        • Higuchi T.
        • Akane A.
        • Nasu M.
        Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) membrane test for forensic examination of semen.
        Leg. Med. (Tokyo). 2001; 3: 171-176
        • Boward E.S.
        • Wilson S.L.
        A comparison of ABAcard((R)) p30 and RSID-semen test kits for forensic semen identification.
        J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2013; 20: 1126-1130
        • Hobbs M.M.
        • Steiner M.J.
        • Rich K.D.
        • Gallo M.F.
        • Alam A.
        • Rahman M.
        • Menezes P.
        • Chipato T.
        • Warner L.
        • Macaluso M.
        Good performance of rapid prostate-specific antigen test for detection of semen exposure in women: implications for qualitative research.
        Sex. Transm. Dis. 2009; 36: 501-506
        • Song F.
        • Luo H.
        • Hou Y.
        Developed and evaluated a multiplex mRNA profiling system for body fluid identification in Chinese Han population.
        J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2015; 35: 73-80
        • Dumache R.
        • Ciocan V.
        • Muresan C.
        • Rogobete A.F.
        • Enache A.
        Circulating MicroRNAs as promising biomarkers in forensic body fluids identification.
        Clin. Lab. 2015; 61: 1129-1135
        • Nussbaumer C.
        • Gharehbaghi-Schnell E.
        • Korschineck I.
        Messenger RNA profiling: a novel method for body fluid identification by real-time PCR.
        Forensic Sci. Int. 2006; 157: 181-186
        • Haas C.
        • Klesser B.
        • Maake C.
        • Bar W.
        • Kratzer A.
        mRNA profiling for body fluid identification by reverse transcription endpoint PCR and realtime PCR.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2009; 3: 80-88
        • Kader F.
        • Ghai M.
        DNA methylation and application in forensic sciences.
        Forensic Sci. Int. 2015; 249: 255-265
        • Schaukowitch K.
        • Kim T.K.
        Emerging epigenetic mechanisms of long non-coding RNAs.
        Neuroscience. 2014; 264: 25-38
        • Isagawa T.
        • Nagae G.
        • Shiraki N.
        • Fujita T.
        • Sato N.
        • Ishikawa S.
        • Kume S.
        • Aburatani H.
        DNA methylation profiling of embryonic stem cell differentiation into the three germ layers.
        PLoS One. 2011; 6: e26052
        • Lokk K.
        • Modhukur V.
        • Rajashekar B.
        • Martens K.
        • Magi R.
        • Kolde R.
        • Koltsina M.
        • Nilsson T.K.
        • Vilo J.
        • Salumets A.
        • Tonisson N.
        DNA methylome profiling of human tissues identifies global and tissue-specific methylation patterns.
        Genome Biol. 2014; 15: r54
        • Igarashi J.
        • Muroi S.
        • Kawashima H.
        • Wang X.
        • Shinojima Y.
        • Kitamura E.
        • Oinuma T.
        • Nemoto N.
        • Song F.
        • Ghosh S.
        • Held W.A.
        • Nagase H.
        Quantitative analysis of human tissue-specific differences in methylation.
        Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008; 376: 658-664
        • Hayatsu H.
        • Shiraishi M.
        • Negishi K.
        Bisulfite modification for analysis of DNA methylation.
        Curr. Protoc. Nucleic Acid Chem. 2008; (Chapter 6 Unit 6 10)
        • Madi T.
        • Balamurugan K.
        • Bombardi R.
        • Duncan G.
        • McCord B.
        The determination of tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns in forensic biofluids using bisulfite modification and pyrosequencing.
        Electrophoresis. 2012; 33: 1736-1745
        • Balamurugan K.
        • Bombardi R.
        • Duncan G.
        • McCord B.
        Identification of spermatozoa by tissue-specific differential DNA methylation using bisulfite modification and pyrosequencing.
        Electrophoresis. 2014; 35: 3079-3086
        • Silva D.S.
        • Antunes J.
        • Balamurugan K.
        • Duncan G.
        • Alho C.S.
        • McCord B.
        Developmental validation studies of epigenetic DNA methylation markers for the detection of blood, semen and saliva samples.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2016; 23: 55-63
        • Delaney C.
        • Garg S.K.
        • Yung R.
        Analysis of DNA methylation by pyrosequencing.
        Methods Mol. Biol. 2015; 1343: 249-264
        • Lee H.Y.
        • Park M.J.
        • Choi A.
        • An J.H.
        • Yang W.I.
        • Shin K.J.
        Potential forensic application of DNA methylation profiling to body fluid identification.
        Int. J. Legal Med. 2012; 126: 55-62
        • An J.H.
        • Choi A.
        • Shin K.J.
        • Yang W.I.
        • Lee H.Y.
        DNA methylation-specific multiplex assays for body fluid identification.
        Int. J. Legal Med. 2013; 127: 35-43
        • Lee H.Y.
        • An J.H.
        • Jung S.E.
        • Oh Y.N.
        • Lee E.Y.
        • Choi A.
        • Yang W.I.
        • Shin K.J.
        Genome-wide methylation profiling and a multiplex construction for the identification of body fluids using epigenetic markers.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2015; 17: 17-24
        • Gonzalgo M.L.
        • Liang G.
        Methylation-sensitive single-nucleotide primer extension (Ms-SNuPE) for quantitative measurement of DNA methylation.
        Nat. Protoc. 2007; 2: 1931-1936
        • Grunau C.
        • Clark S.J.
        • Rosenthal A.
        Bisulfite genomic sequencing: systematic investigation of critical experimental parameters.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29: E65
        • Melnikov A.A.
        • Gartenhaus R.B.
        • Levenson A.S.
        • Motchoulskaia N.A.
        • Levenson Chernokhvostov V.V.
        MSRE-PCR for analysis of gene-specific DNA methylation.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33: e93
        • Vidaki A.
        • Daniel B.
        • Court D.S.
        Forensic DNA methylation profiling–potential opportunities and challenges.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2013; 7: 499-507
        • Frumkin D.
        • Wasserstrom A.
        • Budowle B.
        • Davidson A.
        DNA methylation-based forensic tissue identification.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2011; 5: 517-524
        • Wasserstrom A.
        • Frumkin D.
        • Davidson A.
        • Shpitzen M.
        • Herman Y.
        • Gafny R.
        Demonstration of DSI-semen–A novel DNA methylation-based forensic semen identification assay.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2013; 7: 136-142
        • Dedeurwaerder S.
        • Defrance M.
        • Calonne E.
        • Denis H.
        • Sotiriou C.
        • Fuks F.
        Evaluation of the infinium methylation 450 K technology.
        Epigenomics. 2011; 3: 771-784
        • Park J.L.
        • Kwon O.H.
        • Kim J.H.
        • Yoo H.S.
        • Lee H.C.
        • Woo K.M.
        • Kim S.Y.
        • Lee S.H.
        • Kim Y.S.
        Identification of body fluid-specific DNA methylation markers for use in forensic science.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014; 13: 147-153
        • Forat S.
        • Huettel B.
        • Reinhardt R.
        • Fimmers R.
        • Haidl G.
        • Denschlag D.
        • Olek K.
        Methylation markers for the identification of body fluids and tissues from forensic trace evidence.
        PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0147973
        • Farkas S.A.
        • Milutin-Gasperov N.
        • Grce M.
        • Nilsson T.K.
        Genome-wide DNA methylation assay reveals novel candidate biomarker genes in cervical cancer.
        Epigenetics. 2013; 8: 1213-1225
        • Souren N.Y.
        • Lutsik P.
        • Gasparoni G.
        • Tierling S.
        • Gries J.
        • Riemenschneider M.
        • Fryns J.P.
        • Derom C.
        • Zeegers M.P.
        • Walter J.
        Adult monozygotic twins discordant for intra-uterine growth have indistinguishable genome-wide DNA methylation profiles.
        Genome Biol. 2013; 14: R44
        • Slieker R.C.
        • Bos S.D.
        • Goeman J.J.
        • Bovee J.V.
        • Talens R.P.
        • van der Breggen R.
        • Suchiman H.E.
        • Lameijer E.W.
        • Putter H.
        • van den Akker E.B.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Jukema J.W.
        • Slagboom P.E.
        • Meulenbelt I.
        • Heijmans B.T.
        Identification and systematic annotation of tissue-specific differentially methylated regions using the Illumina 450k array.
        Epigenetics Chromatin. 2013; 6: 26
        • Reinius L.E.
        • Acevedo N.
        • Joerink M.
        • Pershagen G.
        • Dahlen S.E.
        • Greco D.
        • Soderhall C.
        • Scheynius A.
        • Kere J.
        Differential DNA methylation in purified human blood cells: implications for cell lineage and studies on disease susceptibility.
        PLoS One. 2012; 7: e41361
        • Krausz C.
        • Sandoval J.
        • Sayols S.
        • Chianese C.
        • Giachini C.
        • Heyn H.
        • Esteller M.
        Novel insights into DNA methylation features in spermatozoa: stability and peculiarities.
        PLoS One. 2012; 7: e44479
        • Untergasser A.
        • Cutcutache I.
        • Koressaar T.
        • Ye J.
        • Faircloth B.C.
        • Remm M.
        • Rozen S.G.
        Primer3–new capabilities and interfaces.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40: e115
        • van den Berge M.
        • Bhoelai B.
        • Harteveld J.
        • Matai A.
        • Sijen T.
        Advancing forensic RNA typing: on non-target secretions, a nasal mucosa marker, a differential co-extraction protocol and the sensitivity of DNA and RNA profiling.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2016; 20: 119-129
        • Lin Y.C.
        • Tsai L.C.
        • Lee J.C.
        • Liu K.L.
        • Tzen J.T.
        • Linacre A.
        • Hsieh H.M.
        Novel identification of biofluids using a multiplex methylation-specific PCR combined with single-base extension system.
        Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2016; 12: 128-138
        • Tanaka K.
        • Okamoto A.
        Degradation of DNA by bisulfite treatment.
        Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007; 17: 1912-1915
        • Lindenbergh A.
        • de Pagter M.
        • Ramdayal G.
        • Visser M.
        • Zubakov D.
        • Kayser M.
        • Sijen T.
        A multiplex (m)RNA-profiling system for the forensic identification of body fluids and contact traces.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2012; 6: 565-577
        • Mulero J.J.
        • Chang C.W.
        • Lagace R.E.
        • Wang D.Y.
        • Bas J.L.
        • McMahon T.P.
        • Hennessy L.K.
        Development and validation of the AmpFlSTR MiniFiler PCR Amplification Kit: a MiniSTR multiplex for the analysis of degraded and/or PCR inhibited DNA.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2008; 53: 838-852
        • Flores S.
        • Sun J.
        • King J.
        • Budowle B.
        Internal validation of the GlobalFiler Express PCR Amplification Kit for the direct amplification of reference DNA samples on a high-throughput automated workflow.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014; 10: 33-39