Advertisement
Correspondence| Volume 25, e3, November 2016

Response to Jamieson’s and Bader’s comments on Breathnach et al. Probability of detection of DNA deposited by habitual wearer and/or the second individual who touched the garment

Published:October 03, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.10.001
      We thank Jamieson and Bader for their letter in reply to our article [
      • Breathnach M.
      • Williams L.
      • McKenna L.
      • Moore E.
      Probability of detection of DNA deposited by habitual wearer and/or the second individual who touched the garment.
      ] and their acknowledgement that our work is adding knowledge to the complex area of DNA transfer.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Forensic Science International: Genetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Breathnach M.
        • Williams L.
        • McKenna L.
        • Moore E.
        Probability of detection of DNA deposited by habitual wearer and/or the second individual who touched the garment.
        Forensic Sci. Int: Genet. 2016; 20: 53-60
        • Jamieson A.
        • Bader S.
        Letter: Commentary on Breathnach et al.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2016; 20: e4-e5
        • European Network of Forensic Science Institutes
        ENFSI Guideline for Evaluative Reporting in Forensic Science-Strengthening the Evaluation of Results Across Europe (STEOFRAE).
        2015