Advertisement

Identifying common donors in DNA mixtures, with applications to database searches

Published:October 13, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.10.003

      Highlights

      • We investigate whether mixtures have a donor in common using a likelihood ratio approach.
      • This is a generalization of traditional trace-person likelihood ratios to trace-trace LR's.
      • We describe the implementation of the method for a semi-continuous evaluation model.
      • We investigate the method's efficiency using our semi-continuous model for various mixture types.
      • We describe in detail the application of the method to the mixtures in the Dutch DNA database.

      Abstract

      Several methods exist to compute the likelihood ratio LR(M, g) evaluating the possible contribution of a person of interest with genotype g to a mixed trace M. In this paper we generalize this LR to a likelihood ratio LR(M1, M2) involving two possibly mixed traces M1 and M2, where the question is whether there is a donor in common to both traces. In case one of the traces is in fact a single genotype, then this likelihood ratio reduces to the usual LR(M, g). We explain how our method conceptually is a logical consequence of the fact that LR calculations of the form LR(M, g) can be equivalently regarded as a probabilistic deconvolution of the mixture.
      Based on simulated data, and using a semi-continuous mixture evaluation model, we derive ROC curves of our method applied to various types of mixtures. From these data we conclude that searches for a common donor are often feasible in the sense that a very small false positive rate can be combined with a high probability to detect a common donor if there is one. We also show how database searches comparing all traces to each other can be carried out efficiently, as illustrated by the application of the method to the mixed traces in the Dutch DNA database.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Forensic Science International: Genetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Steele C.
        • Balding D.
        Statistical evaluation of forensic DNA profile evidence.
        Annu. Rev. Stat. Appl. 2014; 1: 361-384
        • Bleka Ø.
        • Dørum G.
        • Haned H.
        • Gill P.
        Database extraction strategies for low-template evidence.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2013; 9: 134-141
        • Bright J.-A.
        • Taylor D.
        • Curran J.
        • Buckleton J.
        Searching mixed DNA profiles directly against profile databases.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2013; 9: 102-110
        • Gill P.
        • Bleka Ø.
        • Egeland T.
        Does an English appeal court ruling increase the risks of miscarriages of justice when complex DNA profiles are searched against the national DNA database?.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2014; 13: 167-175
        • Slooten K.
        Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2015; 21: 95-109
        • Slooten K.
        Familial searching on DNA mixtures with dropout.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2016; 22: 128-138
        • Balding D.
        • Nichols R.
        DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands.
        Forensic Sci. Int. 1994; 64: 125-140
        • Slooten K.
        • Egeland T.
        Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.
        Int. J. Legal Med. 2016; 130: 39-57
        • Slooten K.
        • Meester R.
        Probabilistic strategies for familial DNA searching.
        J. R. Stat. Soc.: Ser. C (Appl. Stat.). 2014; 63: 361-384
        • Kruijver M.
        Efficient computations with the likelihood ratio distribution.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2015; 14: 116-124
        • Kruijver M.
        Characterizing the genetic structure of a forensic DNA database using a latent variable approach.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2016; 23: 130-149
        • Westen A.
        • et al.
        Comparing six commercial autosomal STR kits in a large Dutch population sample.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2014; 10: 23-55
        • van Dongen C.
        • Slooten K.
        • Slagter M.
        • Burgers W.
        • Wiegerinck W.
        Bonaparte: application of new software for missing person's programme.
        Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. Suppl. Ser. 2011; 3: 119-120