Advertisement

Making decisions in missing person identification cases with low statistical power

      Highlights

      • General strategy for dealing with low statistical power in missing person and disaster victim identification cases.
      • Method for selecting a likelihood ratio (LR) threshold for identifications through DNA-database search.
      • Error rates estimated by conditional simulation.
      • Examples based on unsolved cases of ‘Missing Grandchildren of Argentina’.
      • Freely available software.

      Abstract

      The present work proposes a general strategy for dealing with missing person identification cases through DNA-database search. Our main example is the identification of abducted children in the last civic-dictatorship of Argentina, known as the “Missing Grandchildren of Argentina”. Particularly we focus on those pedigrees where few, or only distant relatives of the missing person are available, resulting in low statistical power. For such complex cases we provide a statistical method for selecting a likelihood ratio (LR) threshold for each pedigree based on error rates. Furthermore, we provide an open-source user friendly software for computing LR thresholds and error rates. The strategy described in the paper could be applied to other large-scale cases of DNA-based identification hampered by low statistical power.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Forensic Science International: Genetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kling D.
        • Egeland T.
        • Piñero M.H.
        • Vigeland M.D.
        Evaluating the statistical power of DNA-based identification, exemplified by ‘The Missing Grandchildren of Argentina’.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2017; 31: 57-66
        • Ge J.
        • Budowle B.
        • Chakraborty R.
        Choosing relatives for DNA identification of missing persons.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2011; 56: S23-S28
        • Baeta M.
        • Núñez C.
        • Cardoso S.
        • Palencia-Madrid L.
        • Herrasti L.
        • Etxeberria F.
        • de Pancorbo M.M.
        Digging up the recent Spanish memory: genetic identification of human remains from mass graves of the Spanish Civil War and posterior dictatorship.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2015; 19: 272-279
        • Vigeland M.D.
        • Marsico F.L.
        • Herrera Piñero M.
        • Egeland T.
        Prioritising family members for genotyping in missing person cases: a general approach combining the statisti-cal power of exclusion and inclusion.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020; 49102376https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102376
        • Slooten K.
        Likelihood ratio distributions and the (ir) relevance of error rates.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020; 44102173
        • Cho S.
        • Shin E.S.
        • Yu H.J.
        • Lee J.H.
        • Seo H.J.
        • Kim M.Y.
        • Lee S.D.
        Set up of cutoff thresholds for kinship determination using SNP loci.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2017; 29: 1-8
        • Li L.
        • Ye Y.
        • Song F.
        • Wang Z.
        • Hou Y.
        Genetic structure and forensic parameters of 30 InDels for human identification purposes in 10 Tibetan populations of China.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019; 40 (9): e219-e227
        • Kruijver M.
        • Meester R.
        • Slooten K.
        Optimal strategies for familial searching.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014; 13: 90-103
        • Penchaszadeh V.B.
        Genetic identification of children of the disappeared in Argentina.
        J. Am. Med. Women’s Assoc. 1997; 52: 16-21
        • Berra J.
        • Grinspon D.
        • Liwski N.
        • Binz M.T.
        Genetical identification of “missing” children in Argentina.
        In 11th Congress of the Society for Forensic Haemogenetics (Gesellschaft Fur Forensische Blutgruppenkunde eV). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg1986: 443-448
        • Rittner C.
        • Schneider P.M.
        14th congress of the international society for forensic haemogenetics (Internationale Gesellschaft for forensis che Hamogenetik eV), Mainz, September 18–21, 1991.
        Advances in Forensic Haemogenetics. Springer Science Business Media, 2013
        • Penchaszadeh V.B.
        Use of DNA Identification in Human Rights Work to Reunite Families in Latin America.
        eLife Sci. 2001; : 1-8
        • Egeland T.
        • Pinto N.
        • Vigeland M.D.
        A general approach to power calculation for relationship testing.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014; 9: 186-190
        • Ricciardi F.
        • Slooten K.
        Mutation models for DVI analysis.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014; 11: 85-95
        • Slooten K.J.
        • Egeland T.
        Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.
        Int. J. Leg. Med. 2016; 130: 39-57
        • Rota M.
        • Antolini L.
        Finding the optimal cut-point for Gaussian and Gamma distributed biomarkers.
        Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2014; 69: 1-14
        • Egeland T.
        • Mostad P.F.
        • Mevag B.
        • Stenersen M.
        Beyond traditional paternity and identification cases: selecting the most probable pedigree.
        Forensic Sci. Int. 2000; 110: 47-59
        • Kling D.
        • Tillmar A.O.
        • Egeland T.
        Familias 3–Extensions and new functionality.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014; 13: 121-127
        • Tillmar A.O.
        • Mostad P.
        Choosing supplementary markers in forensic casework.
        Foren. Sci. Sci. Int. Genet. 2014; 13: 128-133
        • Hedell R.
        • Hedman J.
        • Mostad P.
        Determining the optimal forensic DNA analysis procedure following investigation of sample quality.
        Int. J. Leg. Med. 2018; 132: 955-966
        • Gittelson S.
        • Biedermann A.
        • Bozza S.
        • Taroni F.
        The database search problem: a question of rational decision making.
        Forensic Sci. Int. 2012; 222: 186-199
        • Biedermann A.
        • Taroni F.
        Bayesian networks for evaluating forensic DNA profiling evidence: a review and guide to literature.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2012; 6: 147-157
        • Ge J.
        • Chakraborty R.
        • Eisenberg A.
        • Budowle B.
        Comparisons of familial DNA database searching strategies.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2011; 56: 1448-1456
        • Caridi I.
        • Dorso C.O.
        • Gallo P.
        • Somigliana C.
        A framework to approach problems of forensic anthropology using complex networks.
        Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2011; 390: 1662-1676
        • Caridi I.
        • Alvarez E.E.
        • Somigliana C.
        • Puerto M.S.
        Using already-solved cases of a mass disaster event for prioritizing the search among remaining victims: a Bayesian approach.
        Sci. Rep. 2020; 10: 1-11