- •First study obtaining DNA profiles from capsules used to contain ecstasy.
- •Informative profiles from touch DNA were produced for 48 out of 60 capsules.
- •Now possible to profile illicit drugs biologically as well as chemically.
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Forensic Science International: Genetics
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, National Drug Strategy Household Survey, in Drug Statistics series no. 32. 2020, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Canberra AIHW. 2019, p. 38–39.
- An overview of forensic drug testing methods and their suitability for harm reduction point-of-care services.Harm Reduct. J. 2017; 14: 52
- Chemical profiling: a tool to decipher the structure and organisation of illicit drug markets: an 8-year study in Western Switzerland.Forensic Sci. Int. 2016; 266: 18-28
- Illicit drug chemical profiling: current and future state.Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2018; 50: 689-696
- Illicit drug profiling, reflection on statistical comparisons.Forensic Sci. Int. 2011; 207: 27-34
- Review of the most common chemometric techniques in illicit drug profiling.Forensic Sci. Int. 2019; 302109911
A. Peacock, A. Karlsson, J. Uporova, O. Price, R. Chan, R. Swanton, D. Gibbs, R. Bruno, P. Dietze, S. Lenton, C. Salom, L. Degenhardt, M. Farrell, Australian Drug Trends 2020: Key Findings from the National Ecstasy and Related Drugs Reporting System (EDRS) Interviews. 2020, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney: Sydney.
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs Drug Addiction, Recent changes in Europe’s MDMA/ecstasy market. EMCDDA Rapid Communication, 2016.
- Illicit drug profiling: the Australian experience.Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2007; 39: 25-32
- Illicit drug profiling: the Australian experience–revisited.Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2017; 49: 591-604
- Variation in forensic DNA profiling success among sampled items and collection methods: a Queensland perspective.Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2020; : 1-14
- DNA transfer in forensic science: a review.Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2019; 38: 140-166
- The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals to inert surfaces.Forensic Sci. Int. 2002; 129: 25-34
- A review of trace “Touch DNA” deposits: variability factors and an exploration of cellular composition.Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2019; 39: 8-18
- Shedder status—an analysis of self and non-self DNA in multiple handprints deposited by the same individuals over time.Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2016; 23: 190-196
- How many cells are required for successful DNA profiling?.Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2021; 51102453
- DNA transfer: review and implications for casework.Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2013; 7: 434-443
- (in International congress series)Fingerprints from Fingerprints. Elsevier, 2003
- Touch DNA: impact of handling time on touch deposit and evaluation of different recovery techniques: an experimental study.Sci. Rep. 2019; 9: 1-9
- DNA fingerprints from fingerprints.Nature. 1997; 387 (-767): 767
- Persistence of DNA deposited by the original user on objects after subsequent use by a second person.Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2014; 8: 219-225
- An analysis of the success rate of 908 trace DNA samples submitted to the Crime Sample Database Unit in New Zealand.Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2008; 40: 49-53
- DNA profiling success rates of commonly submitted crime scene items.Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. Suppl. Ser. 2019; 7: 597-599
L.A. Burgoyne et al., Assessment of the utility of obtaining human profiles from drug seizures. 2012, National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund (NDLERF): Hobart.
L.A. Burgoyne, D.E. Catcheside, K.P. Kirkbride, The bioprofiling of illicit drugs. National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund (NDLERF): Hobart, 2008.
- A Survey of Methods and Tools for Large-scale DNA Mixture Profiling, in Smart Infrastructure and Applications. Springer, 2020: 217-248
- A comparative study of qualitative and quantitative models used to interpret complex STR DNA profiles.Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2016; 25: 85-96
- The Probabilistic genotyping software STR mix: utility and evidence for its validity.J. Forensic Sci. 2019; 64: 393-405
- Internal validation of STRmixTM for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2017; 29: 126-144
- Genetic genealogy for cold case and active investigations.Forensic Sci. Int. 2019; 299: 103-113
- Application of next-generation sequencing technology in forensic science.Genom., Proteom. Bioinforma. 2014; 12: 190-197
- Ancestry and phenotype predictions from touch DNA using massively parallel sequencing.Int. J. Leg. Med. 2021; 135: 81-89
- Shedding light on shedders.Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2018; 36: 20-25
- Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists. 244. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA1998