Highlights
- •salivary microbiota composition to support discrimination between related individuals.
- •Beta-diversity indeces to highlight taxonomical differences between pairs of individuals.
- •a probabilistic approach to evaluate salivary microbiome.
Abstract
Keywords
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Forensic Science International: GeneticsReferences
- Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists. third ed. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester2021
- Interpreting DNA evidence: can probability theory help?.in: Gastwirth JL Statistical Science in the Courtroom. Springer-Verlag, New York2000: 51-70
- Critical analysis of forensic cut-offs and legal thresholds: A coherent approach to inference and decision.Forensic Sci. Int. 2018; 288: 72-80
- Relatedness and DNA: are we taking it seriously enough?.Forensic Sci. Int. 2005; 152: 115-119
- Setting bounds for the likelihood ratio when multiple hypotheses are postulated.Sci. Justice. 1998; 38: 23-26
- Integrating the microbiome as a resource in the forensics toolkit.Forensic Sci. Int.: Genet. 2017; 30: 141-147
C. Dong, M. Wedel, A. Kopyakova.Package ‘BANOVA’, 2021.〈https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BANOVA/BANOVA.pdf〉.
- Evaluating DNA profiles in the case where the defence is it was my brother.J. Forensic Sci. Soc. 1992; 35: 5-14
- Expert evidence and forensic misconceptions of the nature of exact science.Sci. Justice. 1996; 36: 118-122
- Measuring the diversity of the human microbiota with targeted next-generation sequencing.Brief. Bioinforma. 2018; 19: 679-692
- The scientist and the scales of justice.Sci. Justice. 2000; 40: 81-85
- Some caveats concerning DNA as criminal identification evidence: with thanks to the Reverend Bayes.Cardozo Law Rev. 1991; 13: 303-341
- A problem in forensic science.Biometrika. 1977; 64: 207-213
- Defence against the modern arts: the curse of statistics: Part II: score-based likelihood ratios.Law, Probab. Risk. 2020; 19: 21-42https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgaa006
- Interpreting evidence.Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester1995
V. Scherz.Microbiota profiling: forensic application. PhD thesis, Univertsity of Lausanne, Institute of Microbiology, April 2021.
V. Scherz, C. Bertelli, S. Bozza, S. Aeby, O. Opota, L. Falquet, F. Taroni, G. Greub.When the defense says: no, it is my twin brother: a salivary microbiota-based identification of monozygotic twins. Technical report, University of Lausanne, Institute of Microbiology, April 2021.
- Density estimation.Chaptman & Hall,, London1986
S M Willis, L McKenna, S McDermott, G O’Donell, A Barrett, B Rasmusson, A Nordgaard, C E H Berger, M J Sjerps, J J Lucena-Molina, G Zadora, C C G Aitken, T Lovelock, L Lunt, C Champod, A Biedermann, T N Hicks, and F Taroni,.ENFSI guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science, Strengthening the evaluation of forensic results across Europe (STEOFRAE). Dublin, 2015.
