- •Persistence of blood depends on various investigated parameters.
- •Optimized DNA/RNA analysis strategy provides promising results.
- •Number of foreign alleles detected is marginal.
- •Luminol has a high sensitivity and thus is important for targeted blood sampling.
Blunt force traumas by footwear can result in severe and even fatal head and upper body injuries. Oftentimes, footwear impressions are only partially available and evidential value is limited. DNA evidence on shoe soles could provide crucial evidence helping to solve crimes by linking target DNA to the activity of interest. Little is known about the persistence and detectability of biological material post such offenses and the interplay of factors affecting the analytical success. In this study, we assessed the persistence of blood on shoe soles under varying parameters such as blood location, different sneakers, weather condition, gait, amount of blood, underground and step count. We applied an optimized DNA/RNA workflow adapted to micro-traces without constraints for the primary DNA pipeline. There is a high probability to link donor DNA to the shoe sole for up to 300–400 steps, regardless of the underground, blood location, and amount of blood. Depending on the sole material and the degree of abrasion of the sole, a longer blood persistence can be observed. Considering blood, 98.2% of the initial DNA amount (1 μl initial blood volume) was lost after 100 steps walked on sole areas that are in constant contact with the ground. Proportion of foreign DNA was marginal (avg. 4.4 alleles), minimizing the probability of unintentional DNA transfer in this context. RNA typing showed high specificity but lower sensitivity than presumptive tests used for body fluid identification (BFI). Luminol is essential for targeted sampling on shoe soles, as latent blood traces (>100–200 steps) provided sufficient biological material for DNA/RNA typing. The generated data help to address the activity of interest and evaluate probabilities about prevalence of target DNA important for casework implications and assessments on activity level.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Forensic Science International: Genetics
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Wirkung von Fußtritten gegen Kopf und Thorax.Kaos GL Derg. 2002; 21: 147-173https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7990-1
- Kicking to death - forensic and criminological aspects.Forensic Sci. Int. 2001; 123: 165-171https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00542-4
- Biomechanical assessment of the injury risk of stomping.Int. J. Leg. Med. 2016; 130: 827-834https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1254-7
- Wiedergabe eines Sohlenprofils als Positivabdruck.Rechtsmedizin. 2013; 23: 498-500https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-013-0886-5
- Simulating forensic casework scenarios in experimental studies: the generation of footwear marks in blood.Forensic Sci. Int. 2016; 264: 34-40https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.023
- Accident or crime? About the meaning of face injuries inflicted by blunt force.Forensic Sci. Res. 2016; 1: 14-21https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2016.1229378
- DNA transfer to worn upper garments during different activities and contacts: an inter-laboratory study.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020; 46102268https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102268
- Investigation of DNA transfer onto clothing during regular daily activities.Int. J. Leg. Med. 2018; 132: 1035-1042https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1736-x
- DNA transfer: a never ending story. A study on scenarios involving a second person as carrier.Int. J. Leg. Med. 2016; 130: 121-125https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1284-1
- Probability of detection of DNA deposited by habitual wearer and/or the second individual who touched the garment.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2016; 20: 53-60https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.10.001
- Persistence of DNA on clothes after exposure to water for different time periods—a study on bathtub, pond, and river.Int. J. Leg. Med. 2018; 132https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1695-2
- Impact of several wearers on the persistence of DNA on clothes—a study with experimental scenarios.Int. J. Leg. Med. 2018; 132: 117-123https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1742-z
- Assessment of the transfer, persistence, prevalence and recovery of DNA traces from clothing: an inter-laboratory study on worn upper garments.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019; 42: 56-68https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.06.011
- Recovery of dna from shoes.J. Can. Soc. Forensic Sci. 2005; 38: 143-150https://doi.org/10.1080/00085030.2005.10757588
- Recovery of trace DNA and its application to DNA profiling of shoe insoles.Forensic Sci. Int. 2004; 145: 7-12https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.03.016
- Trace DNA sampling success from evidence items commonly encountered in forensic casework.J. Forensic Sci. 2018; 63: 835-841https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13622
- Casework-related DNA transfer on footwear in consideration of the shedder status.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102630
- mRNA profiling of mock casework samples: results of a FoRNAP collaborative exercise.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2021; 50https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102409
- A collaborative European exercise on mRNA-based body fluid/skin typing and interpretation of DNA and RNA results.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014; 10: 40-48https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.01.006
- Development and validation of an mRNA-based multiplex body fluid identification workflow and a rectal mucosa marker pilot study.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2021; 54102542https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102542
- Scene linking using footwear mark databases.Sci. Justice J. Forensic Sci. Soc. 2002; 42: 39-43https://doi.org/10.1016/S1355-0306(02)71795-4
- Looking for the pinpoint: optimizing identification, recovery and DNA extraction of micro traces in forensic casework.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020; 44: 1-9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102191
- Direct PCR amplification of forensic touch and other challenging DNA samples: a review.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2018; 32: 40-49https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.10.005
- How the Investigator Casework GO! Kit provides sensitive, fast and robust direct amplification of low copy number samples.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. Suppl. Ser. 2019; 7: 626-628https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.116
- Secondary DNA transfer of biological substances under varying test conditions.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2010; 4: 62-67https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.05.001
- An evaluation of luminol formulations and their effect on DNA profiling.Int. J. Leg. Med. 2013; 127: 723-729https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0800-9
- Implementation of RNA profiling in forensic casework.Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2013; 7: 159-166https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.09.003
Published online: December 01, 2021
Accepted: November 29, 2021
Received in revised form: November 12, 2021
Received: September 16, 2021
© 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.