Forensic nanopore sequencing of microhaplotype markers using QitanTech’s QNome

References

1. • Jobbing M.A.
   • Gill P.
   Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis.
   Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004; 5: 739-751
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • Kayser M.
   • de Knijff P.
   Improving human forensics through advances in genetics, genomics and molecular biology.
   Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011; 12: 179-192
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Butler J.M.
   Genetics and genomics of core short tandem repeat loci used in human identity testing.
   J. Forensic Sci. 2006; 51: 253-265
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Hares D.R.
   Expanding the CODIS core loci in the United States.
   Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2012; 6: e52-e54
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Hares D.R.
   Selection and implementation of expanded CODIS core loci in the United States.
   Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2015; 17: 33-34
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Goodwin S.
   • McPherson J.D.
   • McCombie W.R.
   Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies.
   Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016; 17: 333-351
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Børsting C.
   • Morling N.
   Next generation sequencing and its applications in forensic genetics.
   Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2015; 18: 78-89
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • Bruijns B.
   • Tiggelaar R.
   • Gardeniers H.
   Massively parallel sequencing techniques for forensics: a review.
   Electrophoresis. 2018; 39: 2642-2654
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Alonso A.
   • Barrio P.A.
   • Müller P.
   • Köcher S.
   • Berger B.
   • Martin P.
   • et al.
   Current state-of-art of STR sequencing in forensic genetics.
   Electrophoresis. 2018; 39: 2655-2668
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Oliveira M.
    • Amorim A.
    Microbial forensics: new breakthroughs and future prospects.
    Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018; 102: 10377-10391
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Haas C.
    • Neubauer J.
    • Salzmann A.P.
    • Hanson E.
    • Ballantyne J.
    Forensic transcriptome analysis using massively parallel sequencing.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2021; 52102486
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Bentley D.R.
    • Balasubramanian S.
    • Swerdlow H.P.
    • Smith G.P.
    • Milton J.
    • Brown C.G.
    • et al.
    Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry.
    Nature. 2008; 456: 53-59
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Rothberg J.M.
    • Hinz W.
    • Rearick T.M.
    • Schultz J.
    • Mileski W.
    • Davey M.
    • et al.
    An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing.
    Nature. 2011; 475: 348-352
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Seo S.B.
    • King J.L.
    • Warshauer D.H.
    • Davis C.P.
    • Ge J.
    • Budowle B.
    Single nucleotide polymorphism typing with massively parallel sequencing.
    Int. J. Leg. Med. 2013; 127: 1079-1086
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Eduardoff M.
    • Santos C.
    • de la Puente M.
    • Gross T.E.
    • Fondevila M.
    • Strobl C.
    • et al.
    Inter-laboratory evaluation of SNP-based forensic identification by massively parallel sequencing using the Ion PGMTM.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2015; 17: 110-121
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Parson W.
    • Strobl C.
    • Huber G.
    • Zimmermann B.
    • Gomes S.M.
    • Souto L.
    • et al.
    Reprint of: evaluation of next generation mtGenome sequencing using the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (PGM).
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2013; 7: 632-639
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • King J.L.
    • LaRue B.L.
    • Novroski N.M.
    • Stoljarova M.
    • Seo S.B.
    • Zeng X.
    • et al.
    High quality and high-throughput massively parallel sequencing of the human mitochondrial genome using the Illumina MiSeq.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014; 12: 128-135
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • McElhoe J.A.
    • Holland M.M.
    • Makova K.D.
    • Su M.S.
    • Paul I.M.
    • Baker C.H.
    • et al.
    Development and assessment of an optimized next-generation DNA sequencing approach for the mtgenome using the Illumina MiSeq.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014; 13: 20-29
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Wang Z.
    • Zhou D.
    • Cao Y.
    • Hu Z.
    • Zhang S.
    • Bian Y.
    • et al.
    Characterization of microRNA expression profiles in blood and saliva using the Ion Personal Genome Machine System (Ion PGMTM System).
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2016; 20: 140-146
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Wang S.
    • Wang Z.
    • Tao R.
    • Wang M.
    • Liu J.
    • He G.
    • et al.
    Expression profile analysis of piwi-interacting RNA in forensically relevant biological fluids.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019; 42: 171-180
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Hanson E.
    • Ingold S.
    • Haas C.
    • Ballantyne J.
    Messenger RNA biomarker signatures for forensic body fluid identification revealed by targeted RNA sequencing.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2018; 34: 206-221
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • Dørum G.
    • Ingold S.
    • Hanson E.
    • Ballantyne J.
    • Russo G.
    • Aluri S.
    • et al.
    Predicting the origin of stains from whole miRNome massively parallel sequencing data.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019; 40: 131-139
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Liu J.
    • Ming T.
    • Lang M.
    • Liu H.
    • Xie M.
    • Li J.
    • et al.
    Exploitation of a novel slowly mutating Y-STRs set and evaluation of slowly mutating Y-STRs plus Y-SNPs typing strategy in forensic genetics and evolutionary research.
    Electrophoresis. 2021; 42: 774-785
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Wang M.
    • Wang Z.
    • He G.
    • Liu J.
    • Wang S.
    • Qian X.
    • et al.
    Developmental validation of a custom panel including 165 Y-SNPs for Chinese Y-chromosomal haplogroups dissection using the ion S5 XL system.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019; 38: 70-76
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Tao R.
    • Qi W.
    • Chen C.
    • Zhang J.
    • Yang Z.
    • Song W.
    • et al.
    Pilot study for forensic evaluations of the Precision ID GlobalFilerTM NGS STR Panel v2 with the Ion S5TM system.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019; 43102147
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Pereira V.
    • Mogensen H.S.
    • Børsting C.
    • Morling N.
    Evaluation of the Precision ID Ancestry Panel for crime case work: a SNP typing assay developed for typing of 165 ancestral informative markers.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2017; 28: 138-145
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • Meiklejohn K.A.
    • Robertson J.M.
    Evaluation of the Precision ID Identity Panel for the Ion TorrentTM PGMTM sequencer.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2017; 31: 48-56
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • Strobl C.
    • Eduardoff M.
    • Bus M.M.
    • Allen M.
    • Parson W.
    Evaluation of the precision ID whole MtDNA genome panel for forensic analyses.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2018; 35: 21-25
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • Zeng X.
    • King J.
    • Hermanson S.
    • Patel J.
    • Storts D.R.
    • Budowle B.
    An evaluation of the PowerSeqTM Auto System: a multiplex short tandem repeat marker kit compatible with massively parallel sequencing.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2015; 19: 172-179
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • Riman S.
    • Iyer H.
    • Borsuk L.A.
    • Vallone P.M.
    Understanding the characteristics of sequence-based single-source DNA profiles.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020; 44102192
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Köcher S.
    • Müller P.
    • Berger B.
    • Bodner M.
    • Parson W.
    • Roewer L.
    • et al.
    Inter-laboratory validation study of the ForenSeqTM DNA Signature Prep Kit.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2018; 36: 77-85
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
32. • Alonso A.
    • Müller P.
    • Roewer L.
    • Willuweit S.
    • Budowle B.
    • Parson W.
    European survey on forensic applications of massively parallel sequencing.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2017; 29: e23-e25
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
33. • Clarke J.
    • Wu H.C.
    • Jayasinghe L.
    • Patel A.
    • Reid S.
    • Bayley H.
    Continuous base identification for single-molecule nanopore DNA sequencing.
    Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009; 4: 265-270
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
34. • Jain M.
    • Olsen H.E.
    • Paten B.
    • Akeson M.
    The Oxford Nanopore MinION: delivery of nanopore sequencing to the genomics community.
    Genome Biol. 2016; 17: 256
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
35. • Plesivkova D.
    • Richards R.
    • Harbison S.
    A review of the potential of the MinIONTM single-molecule sequencing system for forensic applications.
    WIREs Forensic Sci. 2019; 1e1323
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
36. • Hall C.L.
    • Zascavage R.R.
    • Sedlazeck F.J.
    • Planz J.V.
    Potential applications of nanopore sequencing for forensic analysis.
    Forensic Sci. Rev. 2020; 32: 23-54
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
37. • Cornelis S.
    • Gansemans Y.
    • Plaetsen A.V.
    • Weymaere J.
    • Willems S.
    • Deforce D.
    Forensic tri-allelic SNP genotyping using nanopore sequencing.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019; 38: 204-210
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
38. • Cornelis S.
    • Gansemans Y.
    • Deleye L.
    • Deforce D.
    • Nieuwerburgh F.V.
    Forensic SNP genotyping using nanopore MinION sequencing.
    Sci. Rep. 2017; 7: 41759
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
39. • Tytgat O.
    • Gansemans Y.
    • Weymaere J.
    • Rubben K.
    • Deforce D.
    • Nieuwerburgh F.V.
    Nanopore sequencing of a forensic STR multiplex reveals loci suitable for single-contributor STR profiling.
    Genes. 2020; 11: 381
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
40. • Asogawa M.
    • Ohno A.
    • Nakagawa S.
    • Ochiai E.
    • Katahira Y.
    • Sudo M.
    • et al.
    Human short tandem repeat identification using a nanopore-based DNA sequencer: a pilot study.
    J. Hum. Genet. 2020; 65: 21-24
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar

41. S. Cornelis, S. Willems, C. Van Neste, O. Tytgat, J. Weymaere, A. Vander Plaetsen, et al., Forensic STR profiling using Oxford Nanopore Technologies’ MinION sequencer, bioRxiv, 2018, 〈https://doi.org/10.1101/433151〉.

    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
42. • Ren Z.
    • Zhang J.
    • Zhang X.
    • Liu X.
    • Lin Y.
    • Bai H.
    Forensic nanopore sequencing of STRs and SNPs using Verogen’s ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit and MinION.
    Int. J. Leg. Med. 2021; 135: 1685-1693
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
43. • Halla C.L.
    • Kesharwanib R.K.
    • Phillipsa N.R.
    • Planza J.V.
    • Sedlazeckb F.J.
    • Zascavagec R.R.
    Accurate profiling of forensic autosomal STRs using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION device.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2022; 56102629
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
44. • Lindberg M.R.
    • Schmedes S.E.
    • Hewitt F.C.
    • Haas J.L.
    • Ternus K.L.
    • Kadavy D.R.
    • et al.
    A comparison and integration of MiSeq and MinION platforms for sequencing single source and mixed mitochondrial genomes.
    PLoS One. 2016; 11e0167600
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
45. • Vasiljevic N.
    • Lim M.
    • Humble E.
    • Seah A.
    • Kratzer A.
    • Morf N.V.
    • et al.
    Developmental validation of Oxford Nanopore Technology MinION sequence data and the NGSpeciesID bioinformatic pipeline for forensic genetic species identification.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2021; 53102493
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
46. • Kidd K.K.
    • Pakstis A.J.
    • Speed W.C.
    • Lagace R.
    • Chang J.
    • Wootton S.
    • Ihuegbu N.
    Microhaplotype loci are a powerful new type of forensic marker.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. Suppl. Ser. 2013; 4: e123-e124
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
47. • Kidd K.K.
    • Pakstis A.J.
    • Speed W.C.
    • Lagace R.
    • Wootton S.
    • Chang J.
    Selecting microhaplotypes optimized for different purposes.
    Electrophoresis. 2018; 39: 2815-2823
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
48. • Kidd K.K.
    • Speed W.C.
    Criteria for selecting microhaplotypes: mixture detection and deconvolution.
    Investig. Genet. 2015; 6: 1
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
49. • Cheung E.Y.Y.
    • Phillips C.
    • Eduardoff M.
    • Lareu M.V.
    • McNevin D.
    Performance of ancestry-informative SNP and microhaplotype markers.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019; 43102141
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
50. • Oldonia F.
    • Kiddb K.K.
    • Podinia D.
    Microhaplotypes in forensic genetics.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019; 38: 54-69
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
51. • Kidd K.K.
    • Pakstis A.J.
    • Speed W.C.
    • Lagacé R.
    • Chang J.
    • Wootton S.
    • et al.
    Current sequencing technology makes microhaplotypes a powerful new type of genetic marker for forensics.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014; 12: 215-224
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
52. • Staadig A.
    • Tillmar A.
    Evaluation of microhaplotypes in forensic kinship analysis from a Swedish population perspective.
    Int. J. Leg. Med. 2021; 135: 1151-1160
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
53. • Turchi C.
    • Melchionda F.
    • Pesaresi M.
    • Tagliabracci A.
    Evaluation of a microhaplotypes panel for forensic genetics using massive parallel sequencing technology.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019; 41: 120-127
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
54. • de la Puente M.
    • Phillips C.
    • Xavier C.
    • Amigo J.
    • Carracedo A.
    • Parson W.
    • et al.
    Building a custom large-scale panel of novel microhaplotypes for forensic identification using MiSeq and Ion S5 massively parallel sequencing systems.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020; 45102213
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
55. • de la Puente M.
    • Ruiz-Ramírez J.
    • Ambroa-Conde A.
    • Xavier C.
    • Amigo J.
    • de Cal M.Á.C.
    • et al.
    Broadening the applicability of a custom multi-platform panel of microhaplotypes: bio-geographical ancestry inference and expanded reference data.
    Front. Genet. 2020; 11581041
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
56. • Gandotra N.
    • Speed W.C.
    • Qin W.
    • Tang Y.
    • Pakstis A.J.
    • Kidd K.K.
    • et al.
    Validation of novel forensic DNA markers using multiplex microhaplotype sequencing.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020; 47102275
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
57. • Pang J.B.
    • Rao M.
    • Chen Q.F.
    • Ji A.Q.
    • Zhang C.
    • Kang K.L.
    • et al.
    A 124-plex microhaplotype panel based on next-generation sequencing developed for forensic applications.
    Sci. Rep. 2020; 10: 1945
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
58. • Oldoni F.
    • Bader D.
    • Fantinato C.
    • Wootton S.C.
    • Lagacé R.
    • Kidd K.K.
    • et al.
    A sequence-based 74plex microhaplotype assay for analysis of forensic DNA mixtures.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020; 49102367
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
59. • Oldoni F.
    • Yoon L.
    • Wootton S.C.
    • Lagacé R.
    • Kidd K.K.
    • Podini D.
    Population genetic data of 74 microhaplotypes in four major U.S. population groups.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020; 49102398
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar

60. X. Zou, G. He, J. Liu, L. Jiang, M. Wang, P. Chen, et al., Screening and selection of 21 novel microhaplotype markers for ancestry inference in ten Chinese Subpopulations, bioRxiv, 2021, doi: 〈https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.08.467710〉.

    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
61. • Nicogossian A.
    • Kloiber O.
    • Stabile B.
    The Revised World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki 2013: enhancing the protection of human research subjects and empowering ethics review committees.
    World Med. Health Policy. 2014; 6: 1-3
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
62. • Kidd K.K.
    Proposed nomenclature for microhaplotypes.
    Hum. Genom. 2016; 10: 16
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
63. • Wang M.
    • Fu A.
    • Hu B.
    • Tong Y.
    • Liu R.
    • Liu Z.
    • et al.
    Nanopore targeted sequencing for the accurate and comprehensive detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses.
    Small. 2020; 16e2002169
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
64. • Li H.
    Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences.
    Bioinformatics. 2018; 34: 3094-3100
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
65. • Li H.
    • Handsaker B.
    • Wysoker A.
    • Fennell T.
    • Ruan J.
    • Homer N.
    • et al.
    The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools.
    Bioinformatics. 2009; 25: 2078-2079
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
66. • Sahlin K.
    • Medvedev P.
    Error correction enables use of Oxford Nanopore technology for reference-free transcriptome analysis.
    Nat. Commun. 2021; 12: 2
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
67. • Thorvaldsdottir H.
    • Robinson J.T.
    • Mesirov J.P.
    Integrative genomics viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration.
    Brief. Bioinform. 2013; 14: 178-192
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
68. • Wang Z.
    • Zhou D.
    • Wang H.
    • Jia Z.
    • Liu J.
    • Qian X.
    • et al.
    Massively parallel sequencing of 32 forensic markers using the Precision ID GlobalFilerTM NGS STR Panel and the Ion PGMTM System.
    Forensic Sci. Int Genet. 2017; 31: 126-134
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
69. • Wang Z.
    • Wang L.
    • Liu J.
    • Ye J.
    • Hou Y.
    Characterization of sequence variation at 30 autosomal STRs in Chinese Han and Tibetan populations.
    Electrophoresis. 2020; 41: 194-201
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
70. • Shendure J.
    • Balasubramanian S.
    • Church G.M.
    • Gilbert W.
    • Rogers J.
    • Schloss J.A.
    • et al.
    DNA sequencing at 40: past, present and future.
    Nature. 2017; 550: 345-353
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
71. • Parson W.
    • Gusmão L.
    • Hares D.R.
    • Irwin J.A.
    • Mayr W.R.
    • Morling N.
    • et al.
    DNA commission of the international society for forensic genetics: guidelines for mitochondrial DNA typing.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014; 13: 134-142
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
72. • Parson W.
    • Ballard D.
    • Budowle B.
    • Butler J.M.
    • Gettings K.B.
    • Gill P.
    • et al.
    Massively parallel sequencing of forensic STRs: considerations of the DNA commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) on minimal nomenclature requirements.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2016; 22: 54-63
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
73. • Phillips C.
    • Gettings K.B.
    • King J.L.
    • Ballard D.
    • Bodner M.
    • Borsuk L.
    • et al.
    “The devil’s in the detail”: release of an expanded, enhanced and dynamically revised forensic STR sequence guide.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2018; 34: 162-169
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
74. • Barrio P.A.
    • García Ó.
    • Phillips C.
    • Prieto L.
    • Gusmão L.
    • Fernández C.
    • et al.
    The first GHEP-ISFG collaborative exercise on forensic applications of massively parallel sequencing.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020; 49102391
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
75. • Ingold S.
    • Dorum G.
    • Hanson E.
    • Berti A.
    • Branicki W.
    • Brito P.
    • et al.
    Body fluid identification using a targeted mRNA massively parallel sequencing approach-result of a EUROFORGEN/EDNAP collaborative exercise.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2018; 34: 105-115
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
76. • Ingold S.
    • Dorum G.
    • Hanson E.
    • Ballard D.
    • Berti A.
    • Gettings K.B.
    • et al.
    Body fluid identification and assignment to donors using a targeted mRNA massively parallel sequencing approach – results of a second EUROFORGEN/EDNAP collaborative exercise.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020; 45102208
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
77. • Patel A.
    • Belykh E.
    • Miller E.J.
    • George L.L.
    • Martirosyan N.L.
    • Byvaltsev V.A.
    • et al.
    MinION rapid sequencing: Review of potential applications in neurosurgery.
    Surg. Neurol. Int. 2018; 9: 157
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
78. • Gardy J.L.
    • Loman N.J.
    Towards a genomics-informed, real-time, global pathogen surveillance system.
    Nat. Rev. Genet. 2018; 19: 9-20
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
79. • Van der Verren S.E.
    • Van Gerven N.
    • Jonckheere W.
    • Hambley R.
    • Singh P.
    • Kilgour J.
    • et al.
    A dual-constriction biological nanopore resolves homonucleotide sequences with high fidelity.
    Nat. Biotechnol. 2020; 38: 1415-1420
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
80. • Tytgat O.
    • Škevin S.
    • Deforce D.
    • Van Nieuwerburgh F.
    Nanopore sequencing of a forensic combined STR and SNP multiplex.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2021; 56102621
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
81. • Rang F.J.
    • Kloosterman W.P.
    • de Ridder J.
    From squiggle to basepair: computational approaches for improving nanopore sequencing read accuracy.
    Genome Biol. 2018; 19: 90
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
82. • Magi A.
    • Semeraro R.
    • Mingrino A.
    • Giusti B.
    • D’Aurizio R.
    Nanopore sequencing data analysis: state of the art, applications and challenges.
    Brief. Bioinform. 2018; 19: 1256-1272
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
83. • Lu H.
    • Giordano F.
    • Ning Z.
    Oxford nanopore MinION sequencing and genome assembly.
    Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2016; 14: 265-279
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
84. • Loose M.
    • Malla S.
    • Stout M.
    Real-time selective sequencing using nanopore technology.
    Nat. Methods. 2016; 13: 751-754
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar