Advertisement
Research paper| Volume 59, 102704, July 2022

Rapid and direct detection of male DNA by recombinase polymerase amplification assay

  • Seiji Kubo
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Department of Clinical Laboratory and Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences (Medicine), University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
    Affiliations
    Department of Clinical Laboratory and Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences (Medicine), University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, Japan

    Forensic Science Laboratory, Ishikawa Prefectural Police Headquarters, 1-1 Kuratsuki, Kanazawa 920-8553, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Hideki Niimi
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author.
    Affiliations
    Department of Clinical Laboratory and Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences (Medicine), University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Isao Kitajima
    Affiliations
    Department of Clinical Laboratory and Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences (Medicine), University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, Japan
    Search for articles by this author

      Highlights

      • Y-RPA was developed for rapid and simple detection of male DNA.
      • Y-RPA could detect male DNA within 20 min at 39 °C.
      • Y-RPA directly detected male DNA from crude body fluids heated in NaOH for 5 min.
      • Y-RPA is an efficient tool for screening male DNA from forensic samples.

      Abstract

      Screening of male DNA is important in forensic investigations, especially sexual assault cases. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is widely used for the detection of male DNA. However, the use of this technique as a screening tool is time-consuming and labor-intensive. In this study, we established a recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) assay targeting the multicopy loci on the Y-chromosome for the rapid detection of male DNA (referred to as Y-RPA). The Y-RPA assay was able to detect male DNA in less than 20 min with a sensitivity of 0.025–0.005 ng/µL. Additionally, the Y-RPA assay was highly tolerant to inhibitors; male DNA was detectable in the presence of up to 1000 ng/µL humic acid, 250 µM indigo carmine, and 500 µM hematin. Then, considering its tolerance to inhibitors, we examined the feasibility of the direct Y-RPA assay. The alkaline lysis protocol (addition of sodium hydroxide and heating at 95 °C for 5 min) was employed for preparing the DNA template. The Y-RPA assay successfully detected male DNA using crude DNA extracted from blood, saliva, and semen samples. This approach enabled the screening of male DNA within approximately 30 min (5 min for lysis and 20 min for Y-RPA). These findings suggest that the Y-RPA assay is a promising screening tool for the rapid, simple, and efficient detection of male DNA.

      Graphical Abstract

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Forensic Science International: Genetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Butler J.M.
        Advanced Topics in Forensic DNA Typing: Methodology.
        Academic Press, 2012
        • Hochmeister M.N.
        • Budowle B.
        • Rudin O.
        • Gehrig C.
        • Borer U.
        • Thali M.
        • Dirnhofer R.
        Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) membrane test assays for the forensic identification of seminal fluid.
        J. Forensic Sci. 1999; 44: 1057-1060
        • Yokota M.
        • Mitani T.
        • Tsujita H.
        • Kobayashi T.
        • Higuchi T.
        • Akane A.
        • Nasu M.
        Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) membrane test for forensic examination of semen.
        Leg. Med. 2001; 3: 171-176https://doi.org/10.1016/S1344-6223(01)00031-1
        • Romero-Montoya L.
        • Martínez-Rodríguez H.
        • Pérez M.A.
        • Argüello-García R.
        Relationship of spermatoscopy, prostatic acid phosphatase activity and prostate-specific antigen (p30) assays with further DNA typing in forensic samples from rape cases.
        Forensic Sci. Int. 2011; 206: 111-118https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.07.012
        • Weitzig L.
        • Schroeder A.S.
        • Augustin C.
        • Raupach T.
        • Sehner S.
        • Anders S.
        Diagnostic value of PSA and AP tests for the detection of spermatozoa in postmortem swabs from the genital and anal region in males.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2015; 60: 41-44https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12632
        • Soares-Vieira J.A.
        • Correia Billerbeck A.E.
        • Miazato Iwamura E.S.
        • Zampieri R.A.
        • Fígaro Gattás G.J.
        • Munoz D.R.
        • Hallak J.
        • Bilharinho Mendonca B.
        • Lucon A.M.
        Y-STRs in forensic medicine: DNA analysis in semen samples of azoospermic individuals.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2007; 52: 664-670https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00433.x
        • Liu J.Y.
        Direct qPCR quantification of unprocessed forensic casework samples.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014; 11: 96-104https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.03.003
        • Liu J.Y.
        Direct qPCR quantification using the Quantifiler® Trio DNA quantification kit.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014; 13: 10-19https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.06.016
        • Lynch C.
        • Fleming R.
        A review of direct polymerase chain reaction of DNA and RNA for forensic purposes.
        WIREs Forensic Sci. 2019; 1e1335https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1335
        • Scott A.
        • Jackson K.
        • Carter M.
        • Comeau R.
        • Layne T.
        • Landers J.
        Rapid sperm lysis and novel screening approach for human male DNA via colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019; 43102139https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.102139
        • Piepenburg O.
        • Williams C.H.
        • Stemple D.L.
        • Armes N.A.
        DNA detection using recombination proteins.
        PLoS Biol. 2006; 4: 1115-1121https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040204
        • Daher R.K.
        • Stewart G.
        • Boissinot M.
        • Bergeron M.G.
        Recombinase polymerase amplification for diagnostic applications.
        Clin. Chem. 2016; 62: 947-958https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2015.245829
        • Lobato I.M.
        • O’Sullivan C.K.
        Recombinase polymerase amplification: basics, applications and recent advances.
        TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2018; 98: 19-35https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2017.10.015
        • Krõlov K.
        • Frolova J.
        • Tudoran O.
        • Suhorutsenko J.
        • Lehto T.
        • Sibul H.
        • Mäger I.
        • Laanpere M.
        • Tulp I.
        • Langel Ü.
        Sensitive and rapid detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by recombinase polymerase amplification directly from urine samples.
        J. Mol. Diagn. 2014; 16: 127-135https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.08.003
        • Kersting S.
        • Rausch V.
        • Bier F.F.
        • Von Nickisch-Rosenegk M.
        Rapid detection of Plasmodium falciparum with isothermal recombinase polymerase amplification and lateral flow analysis.
        Malar. J. 2014; 13https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-99
        • Moore M.D.
        • Jaykus L.A.
        Development of a recombinase polymerase amplification assay for detection of epidemic human noroviruses.
        Sci. Rep. 2017; 7https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40244
        • Kouprina N.
        • Ebersole T.
        • Koriabine M.
        • Pak E.
        • Rogozin I.B.
        • Katoh M.
        • Oshimura M.
        • Ogi K.
        • Peredelchuk M.
        • Solomon G.
        • Brown W.
        • Barrett J.C.
        • Larionov V.
        Cloning of human centromeres by transformation-associated recombination in yeast and generation of functional human artificial chromosomes.
        Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31: 922-934https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg182
        • Kitamura M.
        • Kubo S.
        • Tanaka J.
        • Adachi T.
        Rapid screening method for male DNA by using the loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay.
        Int. J. Leg. Med. 2018; 132: 975-981https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1661-z
      1. TwistDX, TwistAmp® DNA Amplification Kits Assay Design Manual. 〈https://www.twistdx.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/twistamp-assay-design-manual-v2-5.pdf〉.

      2. TwistDX, TwistAmp® DNA Amplification Kits Combined Instruction Manual. 〈https://www.twistdx.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ta01cmanual-combined-manual_revo_v1-3b.pdf〉.

        • Bustin S.A.
        • Benes V.
        • Garson J.A.
        • Hellemans J.
        • Huggett J.
        • Kubista M.
        • Mueller R.
        • Nolan T.
        • Pfaffl M.W.
        • Shipley G.L.
        • Vandesompele J.
        • Wittwer C.T.
        The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments.
        Clin. Chem. 2009; 55: 611-622https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797
        • Opel K.L.
        • Chung D.
        • McCord B.R.
        A study of PCR inhibition mechanisms using real time PCR.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2010; 55: 25-33https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01245.x
        • Chen G.
        • Dong J.
        • Yuan Y.
        • Li N.
        • Huang X.
        • Cui X.
        • Tang Z.
        A general solution for opening double-stranded DNA for isothermal amplification.
        Sci. Rep. 2016; 6: 1-8https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34582
        • Kojima K.
        • Juma K.M.
        • Akagi S.
        • Hayashi K.
        • Takita T.
        • O’Sullivan C.K.
        • Fujiwara S.
        • Nakura Y.
        • Yanagihara I.
        • Yasukawa K.
        Solvent engineering studies on recombinase polymerase amplification.
        J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2021; 131: 219-224https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2020.10.001
        • Holt A.
        • Wootton S.C.
        • Mulero J.J.
        • Brzoska P.M.
        • Langit E.
        • Green R.L.
        Developmental validation of the Quantifiler® HP and Trio Kits for human DNA quantification in forensic samples.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2016; 21: 145-157https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.12.007
        • Ewing M.M.
        • Thompson J.M.
        • McLaren R.S.
        • Purpero V.M.
        • Thomas K.J.
        • Dobrowski P.A.
        • DeGroot G.A.
        • Romsos E.L.
        • Storts D.R.
        Human DNA quantification and sample quality assessment: developmental validation of the PowerQuant® system.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2016; 23: 166-177https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.04.007
        • Wambua L.
        • Schneider B.
        • Okwaro A.
        • Wanga J.O.
        • Imali O.
        • Wambua P.N.
        • Agutu L.
        • Olds C.
        • Jones C.S.
        • Masiga D.
        • Midega C.
        • Khan Z.
        • Jores J.
        • Fischer A.
        Development of field-applicable tests for rapid and sensitive detection of Candidatus phytoplasma oryzae.
        Mol. Cell. Probes. 2017; 35: 44-56https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2017.06.004
        • Sidstedt M.
        • Jansson L.
        • Nilsson E.
        • Noppa L.
        • Forsman M.
        • Rådström P.
        • Hedman J.
        Humic substances cause fluorescence inhibition in real-time polymerase chain reaction.
        Anal. Biochem. 2015; 487: 30-37https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2015.07.002
        • Sutlovic D.
        • Gamulin S.
        • Definis-Gojanovic M.
        • Gugic D.
        • Andjelinovic S.
        Interaction of humic acids with human DNA: proposed mechanisms and kinetics.
        Electrophoresis. 2008; 29: 1467-1472https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200700699
        • Sidstedt M.
        • Hedman J.
        • Romsos E.L.
        • Waitara L.
        • Wadsö L.
        • Steffen C.R.
        • Vallone P.M.
        • Rådström P.
        Inhibition mechanisms of hemoglobin, immunoglobulin G, and whole blood in digital and real-time PCR.
        Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018; 410: 2569-2583https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-0931-z
        • Hudlow W.R.
        • Buoncristiani M.R.
        Development of a rapid, 96-well alkaline based differential DNA extraction method for sexual assault evidence.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2012; 6: 1-16https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.12.015
        • Nori D.V.
        • McCord B.R.
        The application of alkaline lysis and pressure cycling technology in the differential extraction of DNA from sperm and epithelial cells recovered from cotton swabs.
        Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015; 407: 6975-6984https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-8737-8
        • Myhrvold C.
        • Freije C.A.
        • Gootenberg J.S.
        • Abudayyeh O.O.
        • Metsky H.C.
        • Durbin A.F.
        • Kellner M.J.
        • Tan A.L.
        • Paul L.M.
        • Parham L.A.
        • Garcia K.F.
        • Barnes K.G.
        • Chak B.
        • Mondini A.
        • Nogueira M.L.
        • Isern S.
        • Michael S.F.
        • Lorenzana I.
        • Yozwiak N.L.
        • MacInnis B.L.
        • Bosch I.
        • Gehrke L.
        • Zhang F.
        • Sabeti P.C.
        Field-deployable viral diagnostics using CRISPR-Cas13.
        Science. 2018; 360: 444-448https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas8836
        • Lee R.A.
        • De Puig H.
        • Nguyen P.Q.
        • Angenent-Mari N.M.
        • Donghia N.M.
        • McGee J.P.
        • Dvorin J.D.
        • Klapperich C.M.
        • Pollock N.R.
        • Collins J.J.
        Ultrasensitive CRISPR-based diagnostic for field-applicable detection of Plasmodium species in symptomatic and asymptomatic malaria.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020; 117: 25722-25731https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010196117
        • Dawnay N.
        • Stafford-Allen B.
        • Moore D.
        • Blackman S.
        • Rendell P.
        • Hanson E.K.
        • Ballantyne J.
        • Kallifatidis B.
        • Mendel J.
        • Mills D.K.
        • Nagy R.
        • Wells S.
        Developmental validation of the ParaDNA® screening system - a presumptive test for the detection of DNA on forensic evidence items.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2014; 11: 73-79https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.02.004
        • Crannell Z.A.
        • Rohrman B.
        • Richards-Kortum R.
        Equipment-free incubation of recombinase polymerase amplification reactions using body heat.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9: 1-7https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112146
        • Kubo S.
        • Niimi H.
        • Kitajima I.
        Rapid detection of blood and semen mRNA markers by reverse transcription-recombinase polymerase amplification.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2022; 58102665https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102665