Re: Riman et al. Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset

References

1. • Riman S.
   • Iyer H.
   • Vallone P.M.
   Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset.
   PLoS One. 2021; 16e0256714
   View in Article

   • Scopus (10)
   • PubMed
   • Crossref
   • Google Scholar
2. • Alfonse L.E.
   • Garrett A.D.
   • Lun D.S.
   • Duffy K.R.
   • Grgicak C.M.
   A large-scale dataset of single and mixed-source short tandem repeat profiles to inform human identification strategies: PROVEDIt.
   Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2018; 32: 62-70
   View in Article

   • Scopus (48)
   • PubMed
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full Text PDF
   • Google Scholar
3. • Cheng K.
   • Bleka Ø.
   • Gill P.
   • Curran J.
   • Bright J.-A.
   • Taylor D.
   • Buckleton J.
   A comparison of likelihood ratios obtained from EuroForMix and STRmixTM.
   J. Forensic Sci. 2021; 66: 2138-2155
   View in Article

   • Scopus (11)
   • PubMed
   • Crossref
   • Google Scholar
4. • Lin M.-H.
   • Lee S.-I.
   • Zhang X.
   • Russell L.
   • Kelly H.
   • Cheng K.
   • et al.
   Developmental validation of FaSTRTM DNA: Software for the analysis of forensic DNA profiles.
   Forensic Sci. Int. Rep. 2021; 3100217
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Russell L.
   • Cooper S.
   • Wivell R.
   • Kerr Z.
   • Taylor D.
   • Buckleton J.
   • et al.
   A guide to results and diagnostics within a STRmixTM report.
   WIREs Forensic Sci. 2019; 1e1354
   View in Article

   • Crossref
   • Google Scholar
6. • Taylor D.
   • Buckleton J.
   • Bright J.-A.
   Factors affecting peak height variability for short tandem repeat data.
   Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2016; 21: 126-133
   View in Article

   • Scopus (16)
   • PubMed
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full Text PDF
   • Google Scholar
7. • Grgicak C.M.
   • Duffy K.R.
   • Lun D.S.
   The a posteriori probability of the number of contributors when conditioned on an assumed contributor.
   Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2021; 54102563
   View in Article

   • Scopus (4)
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full Text PDF
   • Google Scholar
8. • Valtl J.
   • Mönich U.J.
   • Lun D.S.
   • Kelley J.
   • Grgicak C.M.
   A series of developmental validation tests for Number of Contributors platforms: exemplars using NOCIt and a neural network.
   Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2021; 54102556
   View in Article

   • Scopus (2)
   • PubMed
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full Text PDF
   • Google Scholar
9. • National Research Council II
   National Research Council Committee on DNA Forensic Science, The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence.
   National Academy Press, Washington, D.C1996
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Kelly H.
    • Bright J.-A.
    • Kruijver M.
    • Cooper S.
    • Taylor D.
    • Duke K.
    • et al.
    A sensitivity analysis to determine the robustness of STRmixTM with respect to laboratory calibration.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2018; 35: 113-122
    View in Article

    • Scopus (19)
    • PubMed
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
11. • Moretti T.R.
    • Just R.S.
    • Kehl S.C.
    • Willis L.E.
    • Buckleton J.S.
    • Bright J.-A.
    • et al.
    Internal validation of STRmix for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2017; 29: 126-144
    View in Article

    • Scopus (61)
    • PubMed
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
12. • Bright J.-A.
    • Taylor D.
    • McGovern C.E.
    • Cooper S.
    • Russell L.
    • Abarno D.
    • et al.
    Developmental validation of STRmixTM, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2016; 23: 226-239
    View in Article

    • Scopus (88)
    • PubMed
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
13. • Buckleton J.S.
    • Bright J.-A.
    • Cheng K.
    • Budowle B.
    • Coble M.D.
    NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX13): a modern analysis.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2018; 37: 172-179
    View in Article

    • Scopus (29)
    • PubMed
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full Text PDF
    • Google Scholar
14. • Ramos D.
    • Gonzalez-Rodriguez J.
    Reliable support: measuring calibration of likelihood ratios.
    Forensic Sci. Int. 2013; 230: 156-169
    View in Article

    • Scopus (73)
    • PubMed
    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar
15. • Bright J.-A.
    • Jones Dukes M.
    • Pugh S.N.
    • Evett I.W.
    • Buckleton J.S.
    Applying calibration to LRs produced by a DNA interpretation software.
    Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2019; : 1-7
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Cheng K.
    • Skillman J.
    • Hickey S.
    • Just R.
    • Moreno L.
    • Bright J.-A.
    • et al.
    Variability and additivity of read counts for aSTRs in NGS DNA profiles.
    Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020; : 48
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Clopper C.J.
    • Pearson E.S.
    The use of confidence or fiducial intervals illustrated in the case of the binomial.
    Biometrika. 1934; 26: 404-413
    View in Article

    • Crossref
    • Google Scholar