Advertisement
Letter| Volume 59, 102710, July 2022

A response to a correspondence letter by Buckleton et al. on: Riman et al. (2021) Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset, PLoS One 16(9):e0256714

Published:April 20, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102710
A response to a correspondence letter by Buckleton et al. on: Riman et al. (2021) Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset, PLoS One 16(9):e0256714
Previous ArticleRe: Riman et al. Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset
Next ArticleMitogenomic diversity in Czechs and Slovaks
      Dear Editor,
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Forensic Science International: Genetics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Riman S.
        • Iyer H.
        • Vallone P.M.
        Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset.
        PloS One. 2021; 16e0256714
        View in Article
        • Cheng K.
        • Bleka Ø.
        • Gill P.
        • Curran J.
        • Bright J.A.
        • Taylor D.
        • Buckleton J.
        A comparison of likelihood ratios obtained from EuroForMix and STRmixTM.
        J. Forensic Sci. 2021; 66: 2138-2155
        View in Article
        • You Y.
        • Balding D.
        A comparison of software for the evaluation of complex DNA profiles.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019; 40: 114-119
        View in Article
        • Bleka Ø.
        • Benschop C.C.G.
        • Storvik G.
        • Gill P.
        A comparative study of qualitative and quantitative models used to interpret complex STR DNA profiles.
        Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2016; 25: 85-96
        View in Article
        • Alfonse L.E.
        • Garrett A.D.
        • Lun D.S.
        • Duffy K.R.
        • Grgicak C.M.
        A large-scale dataset of single and mixed-source short tandem repeat profiles to inform human identification strategies: PROVEDIt, Forensic science international.
        Genetics. 2018; 32: 62-70
        View in Article

      Article info

      Publication history

      Published online: April 20, 2022
      Accepted: April 11, 2022
      Received in revised form: April 11, 2022
      Received: April 8, 2022

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102710

      Copyright

      © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect
      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties. The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      RELX